Cited by 73Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Brief report: Assessing dispositional optimism in adolescence – Factor structure and concurrent validity of the Life Orientation Test – Revised

Monzani, Dario, Steca, Patrizia, Greco, Andrea·2014·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Dispositional optimism is an individual difference promoting psychosocial adjustment and well-being during adolescence. Dispositional optimism was originally defined as a one-dimensional construct; however, empirical evidence suggests two correlated factors in the Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R). The main aim of the study was to evaluate the dimensionality of the LOT-R. This study is the first attempt to identify the best factor structure, comparing congeneric, two correlated-factor, and two orthogonal-factor models in a sample of adolescents. Concurrent validity was also assessed. The results demonstrated the superior fit of the two orthogonal-factor model thus reconciling the one-dimensional definition of dispositional optimism with the bi-dimensionality of the LOT-R. Moreover, the results of correlational analyses proved the concurrent validity of this self-report measure: optimism is moderately related to indices of psychosocial adjustment and well-being. Thus, the LOT-R is a useful, valid, and reliable self-report measure to properly assess optimism in adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monzani, D., Steca, P., & Greco, A.
Affiliations
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Corresponding author
Monzani, Dario
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-08
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
97-101
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2036327755
Cited by
73
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
dispositional optimism, Life Orientation Test-Revised, factor structure, psychosocial adjustment, well-being, adolescents, self-report measures, concurrent validity, congeneric model
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Affect, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Personality, Personality Tests, Self-Assessment, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review