The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulation Modeling and Analysis.
Schervish, M. J., Law, A. M., & Kelton, W. D. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288169 · Cited by 8,697
Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates
FIRTH, D. (1993) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/80.1.27 · Cited by 5,035
Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance
Willmott, C. J. (1982) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:scoteo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,736
Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations
Wilby, R. L., & Wigley, T. M. L. (1997) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/030913339702100403 · Cited by 1,480
Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L. O., Christoph, M., Claussen, M. A., Dümenil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Schlese, U., & Schulzweida, U. (1996) · CentAUR (University of Reading) · doi:10.17617/2.1781494 · Cited by 1,382
Long‐range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States
Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd000659 · Cited by 1,037
Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods
Wilby, R. L., Wigley, T. M. L., Conway, D., Jones, P. D., Hewitson, B. C., Main, J., & Wilks, D. S. (1998) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/98wr02577 · Cited by 868
Understanding Options for Agricultural Production
(1998) · Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3624-4 · Cited by 796
Current approaches to seasonal to interannual climate predictions
Goddard, L., Mason, S. J., Zebiak, S. E., Ropelewski, C. F., Basher, R., & Cane, M. A. (2001) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.636 · Cited by 588
IPCC Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations
Carter, T. R., Parry, M. L., Harasawa, H., & Nishioka, S. (1994) · Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) · Cited by 532
Cited by
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., & Engen-Skaugen, T. (2012) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012 · Cited by 1,318
A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach
Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J., & Piontek, F. (2013) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-4-219-2013 · Cited by 1,238
“For the ame reason, other bias correction methods also applied multiplicative correction factors instead of additive constants to correct, for example, precipitation data (Ines and Hansen, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodStatistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe
Piani, C., Haerter, J. O., & Coppola, E. (2010) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-009-0134-9 · Cited by 1,154
Piani, C., Weedon, G. P., Best, M., Gomes, S. M., Viterbo, P., Hagemann, S., & Haerter, J. O. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.024 · Cited by 868
Jakob Themeßl, M., Gobiet, A., & Leuprecht, A. (2011) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.2168 · Cited by 770
Metadata
- Authors
- Ines, A. V. M., & Hansen, J. W.
- Venue
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 44-53
- ISSN
- 0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150285422
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.009
- The paper
- Ines, A. V. M., & Hansen, J. W. (2006). Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
