Cited by 49Irrigation Practices and Water ManagementEngineering and Agricultural InnovationsWater resources management and optimization

HydroLOGIC: An irrigation management system for Australian cotton

Richards, Q.D., Bange, M.P., Johnston, S.B.·2008·Agricultural Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.009

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, Q. D., Bange, M. P., & Johnston, S. B.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Bange, M.P.
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
40-49
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093492706
Cited by
49
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Seafood Cooperative Research Centre
  • Cotton Research and Development Corporation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Engineering and Agricultural Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
cotton irrigation, water use efficiency, decision support system, furrow irrigation, irrigation scheduling, crop growth simulation, soil moisture monitoring, Australian cotton industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review