Cited by 227Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologySustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use

Open access
Cardoso, Abmael S., Berndt, Alexandre, Leytem, April, Alves, Bruno J.R., de Carvalho, Isabel das N.O., de Barros Soares, Luis Henrique, Urquiaga, Segundo, Boddey, Robert M.·2016·Agricultural Systems

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pasture-based systems often have less GHG intensity from a land use basis than conventional systems.

    “Alternatively, pasture-based systems often have less GHG intensity from a land use basis (Cardoso et al., 2016).”

    From Ecosystem Impacts and Productive Capacity of a Multi-Species Pastured Livestock System (2020) · cites this paper as Cardoso et al., 2016

    Section 3.5 reports that improving degraded pasture to a mixed grass–legume pasture reduced GHG emissions per kilogram of carcass by 50%. The Conclusions also report less land required per kilogram under intensified production. These are comparisons among beef-production scenarios, not evidence that pasture-based systems generally have lower GHG emissions per unit of land than conventional systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boddey, R.M., de Carvalho, I.N.O., Rezende, C. de P., Cantarutti, R.B., Pereira, J.M., Macedo, R., Tarré, R., Alves, B.J.R., Urquiaga, S., 2015. Proceedings of the International Conference on Forages in Warm Climates, 1-3 June, 2015, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil (published on-line at http://www.neforufla.com.br/upimg/ck/files/ Proceedings_CONFOR_2015.pdf) pp. 103-140.
  2. Da Silva, M.R., 2006. Avaliação de alternativa para eletrificação rural no contexto dos programas de universalização do atendimento de energia no Brasil. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Master Thesis Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  3. Pedreira, C.G.S., Silva, L.S., Alonso, M.P., 2015. Use of grazed pastures in the Brazilian live- stock industry: a brief overview. In: Evangelista, A.R., Avila, C.L.S., Casagrande, D.R., Lara, M.A.S., Bernardes, T.F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Forages in Warm Climates. Lavras, MG, Brazil, 1-3 June 2015, pp. 7-17 (Available on-line at: http://www.neforufla.com.br/upimg/ck/files/Proceedings_CONFOR_2015. pdf).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardoso, A. S., Berndt, A., Leytem, A., Alves, B. J. R., de Carvalho, I. D. N. O., de Barros Soares, L. H., Urquiaga, S., & Boddey, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (BR)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Embrapa Agrobiologia (BR)
Corresponding author
Boddey, Robert M.
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
143
Pages
86-96
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2197362951
Cited by
227
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Northwest Irrigation & Soils Research Laboratory Publications (United States Department of Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
beef cattle production, production intensification, greenhouse gas emissions, methane emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, land use, nitrogen fertilization, Brachiaria pasture, Panicum maximum, forage legumes, total mixed ration, carcass production, emission factors, Cerrado, Brazil, feed supplements, animal productivity, enteric methane mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review