Cited by 9Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Cardiovascular event reduction among a US population eligible for semaglutide per the SELECT trial

Lusk, Jay B., Glover, LáShauntá, Soneji, Samir, Granger, Christopher B., O'Brien, Emily, Pagidipati, Neha·2024·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Our objective was to determine the number of major cardiovascular events (MACE, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death) and deaths from any cause that could be prevented across varying nationwide uptake of semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Methods Using a nationally representative cross-sectional study of participants in the 2017-2018 and 2019-March 2020 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the U.S. (NHANES), we estimated the number of MACE and deaths from any cause potentially prevented over a four-year period among participants meeting SELECT trial inclusion criteria. Results In a sample of n = 216 individuals (corresponding to 4,473,681 adults in the U.S. population) potentially eligible for this therapy, a total of 356,329 MACE and 232,808 all-cause mortality events were expected without semaglutide over 4 years and 35,633 MACE and 22,117 all-cause mortality events would be prevented with 50% uptake of semaglutide. Conclusions Approximately 4.5 million adults in the U.S. are forecasted to be eligible for semaglutide 2.4mg SC weekly therapy, with substantial impact on CVD and mortality if accessible and broadly used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.007

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lusk, J. B., Glover, L., Soneji, S., Granger, C. B., O'Brien, E., & Pagidipati, N.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Pagidipati, Neha
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
276
Pages
110-114
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401115491
Cited by
9
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Heart Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
semaglutide, major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, number needed to treat, SELECT trial, GLP-1 receptor agonists, cardiovascular risk reduction
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Nutrition Surveys, United States, Stroke, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review