Cited by 12Art Therapy and Mental HealthMedia Influence and HealthFilm in Education and Therapy

It just gives people hope”: a qualitative inquiry into the lived experience of the Harry Potter world in mental health recovery

Tribe, Kelsey V., Papps, Fiona Ann, Calvert, Fiona·2021·The Arts in Psychotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aip.2021.101802

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive processing of fictional and non-fictional texts differs significantly, with distinct neural networks activated in each case.

    “Research indicates that the cognitive processing of fictional and non-fictional texts differs significantly, with distinct neural networks being activated in each case (37).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tribe, K. V., Papps, F. A., & Calvert, F.
Affiliations
ACAP University College (AU)
Corresponding author
Papps, Fiona Ann
Venue
The Arts in Psychotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
74
Pages
101802
ISSN
0197-4556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3151659657
Cited by
12
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Arts in Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Film in Education and Therapy
Keywords
Harry Potter, mental health recovery, fan engagement, immersive experience, meaning-making, lived experience, early engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review