Cited by 29Art Therapy and Mental HealthMedia Influence and HealthEating Disorders and Behaviors

Fiction-reading for good or ill: eating disorders, interpretation and the case for creative bibliotherapy research

Troscianko, Emily T·2018·Medical Humanities

Abstract

Compared with self-help bibliotherapy, little is known about the efficacy of creative bibliotherapy or the mechanisms of its possible efficacy for eating disorders or any other mental health condition. It is clear, however, that fiction is widely used informally as a therapeutic or antitherapeutic tool and that it has considerable potential in both directions, with a possibly significant distinction between the effects of reading fiction about eating disorders (which may—contrary to theoretical predictions—be broadly negative in effect) or one’s preferred genre of other fiction (which may be broadly positive). Research on creative bibliotherapy, especially systematic experimental research, is lacking and requires a medical humanities approach, drawing on knowledge and methods from psychology and cognitive literary studies as well as clinical disciplines to expand our understanding of how the dynamic processes of interpretation mediate between textual structures and characteristics of mental health and illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/medhum-2017-011375

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence base for creative bibliotherapy remains relatively limited.

    “However, the evidence base for creative bibliotherapy remains relatively limited.”
  • Current research and practice in creative bibliotherapy are insufficient in understanding its mechanisms of action.

    “Troscianko further pointed out that current research and practice in creative bibliotherapy are still insufficient in understanding its mechanisms of action (27).”
  • Creative bibliotherapy has a long history yet has received very little research attention and cannot currently be considered an evidence-based treatment.

    “so-called creative bibliotherapy-patient reading selected works of fiction, as opposed to self-help material-has a long history yet has received very little research attention (Troscianko 2018) and can therefore not currently be considered an evidencebased treatment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troscianko, E. T.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Troscianko, Emily T
Venue
Medical Humanities
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-04-21
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
201-211
ISSN
  • 1468-215X (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4265
OpenAlex
W2801975715
Cited by
29
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
24.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Humanities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
eating disorders, fiction reading, literary interpretation, mental health, cognitive literary studies
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Bibliotherapy, Books, Cognition, Creativity, Humans, Literature, Psychiatry, Reading, Research, Comprehension, Narration, Psychiatry in Literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review