Cited by 158Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersEmergency and Acute Care StudiesVestibular and auditory disorders

Syncope prevalence in the ED compared to general practice and population: a strong selection process

Olde Nordkamp, Louise R.A., van Dijk, Nynke, Ganzeboom, Karin S., Reitsma, Johannes B., Luitse, Jan S.K., Dekker, Lukas R.C., Shen, Win-Kuang, Wieling, Wouter·2009·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective We assessed the prevalence and distribution of the different causes of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) in the emergency department (ED) and chest pain unit (CPU) and estimated the proportion of persons with syncope in the general population who seek medical attention from either their general practitioner or the ED/CPU. Methods A review of the charts of consecutive patients presenting with TLOC at the ED/CPU of our university hospital between 2000 and 2002 was conducted. Patients younger than 12 years or with a known epileptic disorder were excluded. Age and sex of syncopal patients were compared with those in a general practice and general population data sets. Main findings and conclusions During the study period, 0.94% of the patients visiting the ED/CPU presented with TLOC (n = 672), of which half had syncope. Only a small but probably selected group of all people with syncope visit the ED/CPU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.022

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of syncope as a presenting symptom to the ED ranged from 0.8% to 2.4% in multiple studies in both academic and community settings.

    “The prevalence of syncope as a presenting symptom to the ED ranged from 0.8% to 2.4% in multiple studies in both academic and community settings (49–55).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olde Nordkamp, L. R. A., van Dijk, N., Ganzeboom, K. S., Reitsma, J. B., Luitse, J. S. K., Dekker, L. R. C., Shen, W.-K., & Wieling, W.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
271-279
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075337959
Cited by
158
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
syncope, transient loss of consciousness, emergency department utilization, chest pain unit, general practice, prevalence, selection bias, age and sex distribution, general population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Syncope, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review