Cited by 62Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlElectrolyte and hormonal disorders

Novel cardiovascular biomarkers in unexplained syncopal attacks: the SYSTEMA cohort

Open access
Fedorowski, A., Burri, P., Struck, J., Juul‐Möller, S., Melander, O.·2013·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the resting levels of novel cardiovascular biomarkers in common types of noncardiac syncope. DESIGN AND SETTING: An observational study was conducted including 255 patients (mean age 60 years, range 15-93; 45% men) with unexplained syncopal attacks. Subjects underwent an expanded head-up tilt test including carotid sinus massage, and nitroglycerin provocation if indicated. Using logistic regression, we explored the associations between specific diagnoses of syncope and resting levels of circulating biomarkers: C-terminal pro-arginine vasopressin (CT-proAVP), C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment (CT-proET-1), midregional fragments of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM). RESULTS: A total of 142 (56%) patients were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope (VVS), 85 (33%) with orthostatic hypotension (OH) and 47 (18%) with carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH); in addition, 74 (29%) patients had more than one diagnosis. Thirty-five patients (14%) demonstrated a cardioinhibitory reflex. The probability of VVS was highest in the first quartile of MR-proANP [Q1 vs. Q4: odds ratio (OR) 5.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.86-16.74; P < 0.001] and CT-proET-1 (OR 7.17, 95% CI 2.43-21.13; P < 0.001). By contrast, the probability of OH was highest in the fourth quartile of CT-proET-1 (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 8.66, 95% CI 2.49-30.17; P < 0.001). Furthermore, CSH was most frequently observed in the first quartile of MR-proANP (Q1 vs. Q4: OR 6.57, 95% CI 1.62-26.62; P = 0.008) among those over 60 years of age, whereas the cardioinhibitory reflex was strongly associated with low CT-proET-1 levels (Q1 vs. Q4: OR 69.7, 95% CI 6.97-696.6; P < 0.001). Moreover, in patients with VVS, a high concentration of CT-proET-1 was predictive of OH (OR per 1 SD 2.4, 95% CI 1.15-5.02; P = 0.02), whereas low CT-proET-1 suggested involvement of the cardioinhibitory reflex (OR per 1SD 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.70; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of MR-proANP and CT-proET-1 are markedly changed in common forms of syncope, suggesting the involvement of novel neurohormonal mechanisms in syncopal attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.12043

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some cardiovascular biomarkers are increased in autonomic dysfunction underlying syncope, such as elevated copeptin (vasopressin), endothelin-1, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in OH.

    “Some cardiovascular biomarkers are increased in autonomic dysfunction underlying syncope, such as elevated copeptin (vasopressin), endothelin-1, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in OH, 113,230,231”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fedorowski, A., Burri, P., Struck, J., Juul‐Möller, S., & Melander, O.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany) (DE)
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Fedorowski, A.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-20
Volume
273
Issue
4
Pages
359-367
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2042471252
Cited by
62
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (282225)
  • Region Skane
  • Hulda and Conrad Mossfelt Foundation
  • King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria Foundation
  • Wallenberg Foundation
  • Lennart Hanssons Memorial Fund
  • Swedish Medical Research Council
  • Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  • Medical Faculty of Lund University
  • Malmö University Hospital
  • Care North Consortium
  • Albert Påhlsson Research Foundation
  • Crafoord Foundation
  • Ernhold Lundströms Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Keywords
syncope, cardiovascular biomarkers, vasovagal syncope, orthostatic hypotension, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, MR-proANP, proadrenomedullin, head-up tilt, carotid sinus massage, nitroglycerin provocation, systemic blood pressure, heart rate variability, autonomic dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Atrial Natriuretic Factor, Peptide Fragments, Retrospective Studies, Syncope, Vasopressins, Biomarkers, Endothelin-1, Adrenomedullin, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review