Cited by 153Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersVestibular and auditory disordersElectrolyte and hormonal disorders

Management of patients with syncope referred urgently to general hospitals

Open access
Disertori, M·2003·Europace

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and the strategy of management of syncope admitted urgently to a general hospital. BACKGROUND: The management of patients with syncope is not standardized. METHODS: The study was a prospective observational registry from a sample of 28 general hospitals in Italy and enroled all consecutive patients referred to their emergency rooms from November 5th 2001 to December 7th 2001 who were affected by transient loss of consciousness as the principal symptom. RESULTS: The incidence of syncope was 0.95% (996 of 105,173 patients attending). Forty-six percent were hospitalized, mostly in the Department of Internal Medicine. The mean in-hospital stay was 8.1+/-5.9 days. A mean of 3.48 tests was performed per patient. A definite diagnosis was made in 80% of cases, neurally-mediated syncope being the most frequent. The findings of each of the 28 hospitals participating in the survey were separately evaluated. We observed great inter-hospital and inter-department heterogeneity regarding the incidence of emergency admission, in-hospital pathways, most of the examinations performed and the final assigned diagnosis. For example, the execution of carotid sinus massage ranged from 0% in one hospital to 58% in another (median 12.5%); tilt testing ranged from 0 to 50% (median 5.8%); the final diagnosis of neurally-mediated syncope ranged from 10 to 78.6% (median 43.3%). CONCLUSION: Great inter-hospital and inter-department heterogeneity in the incidence and management of syncope was observed in general hospitals. As a consequence, we were unable to describe a uniform strategy for the management of syncope in everyday practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00049-7

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of syncope as a presenting symptom to the ED ranged from 0.8% to 2.4% in multiple studies in both academic and community settings.

    “The prevalence of syncope as a presenting symptom to the ED ranged from 0.8% to 2.4% in multiple studies in both academic and community settings (49–55).”

    From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that syncope was the principal symptom for 996 of 105,173 emergency-department attendees, an incidence of 0.95%—within the claimed range. This study covers 28 general hospitals, but our copy does not establish the 0.8%–2.4% range across multiple studies in both academic and community settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Santini M. Diagnosing syncope in the clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 935-40.
  2. ANMCO Task Force Report. Orientamenti sulla valutazione diagnostica dei pazienti con sincope. G Ital Cardiol 1995; 25: 937-48.
  3. Linzer M, Yang E, Estes MIII , et al. Diagnosing syncope Part I: value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiog- raphy. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 989-96.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Disertori, M.
Affiliations
Ospedale Santa Chiara (IT)
Corresponding author
Disertori, M
Venue
Europace
Published
2003-07
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
283-291
ISSN
1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158273748
Cited by
153
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Keywords
syncope, neurally mediated syncope, emergency department admission, inpatient management, carotid sinus massage, tilt table test, diagnostic workup, interhospital variation, transient loss of consciousness, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, General, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation, Registries, Syncope, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review