Cited by 96Hospital Admissions and OutcomesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

ED Handoffs: Observed Practices and Communication Errors

Maughan, Brandon C., Lei, Lei, Cydulka, Rita K.·2011·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective The study objectives were to identify emergency department (ED) handoff practices and describe handoff communication errors among emergency physicians. Methods Two investigators observed patient handoffs among emergency physicians in a major metropolitan teaching hospital for 8 weeks. A data collection form was designed to assess handoff characteristics including duration, location, interruptions, and topics including examination, laboratory examinations, diagnosis, and disposition. Handoff errors were defined as clinically significant examination or laboratory findings in physician documentation that were reported significantly differently during or omitted from verbal handoff. Multivariate negative binomial regression models assessed variables associated with these errors. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results One hundred ten handoff sessions encompassing 992 patients were observed. Examination handoff errors and omissions were noted in 130 (13.1%) and 447 (45.1%) handoffs, respectively. More examination errors were associated with longer handoff time per patient, whereas fewer examination omissions were associated with use of written or electronic support materials. Laboratory handoff errors and omissions were noted in 37 (3.7%) and 290 (29.2%) handoffs, respectively. Fewer laboratory errors were associated with use of electronic support tools, whereas more laboratory handoff omissions were associated with longer ED lengths of stay. Co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconsistencies arise between verbal handoffs and EHRs.

    “Moreover, this problem can go beyond personal communication; inconsistencies arise between verbal handoffs and EHRs.”
  • Errors and gaps may happen when clinicians verbally report a test result differently from what is recorded in the medical files, as well as when critical information from lab results is left out during handoff discussions.

    “Errors and gaps may happen when clinicians verbally report a test result differently from what is recorded in the medical files, as well as when critical information from lab results is left out during handoff discussions [271].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maughan, B. C., Lei, L., & Cydulka, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • MetroHealth (US)
Corresponding author
Maughan, Brandon C.
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
502-511
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167926132
Cited by
95
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
patient handover, emergency physicians, laboratory findings, physician documentation, emergency department length of stay
MeSH terms
Communication, Continuity of Patient Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Length of Stay, Medical Records, Physical Examination, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review