Cited by 74Influenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections researchClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Clinical diagnosis of influenza in the ED

Open access
Dugas, Andrea F., Valsamakis, Alexandra, Atreya, Mihir R., Thind, Komal, Alarcon Manchego, Peter, Faisal, Annum, Gaydos, Charlotte A., Rothman, Richard E.·2015·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Background Timely and accurate diagnosis of influenza remains a challenge but is critical for patients who may benefit from antiviral therapy. This study determined the test characteristics of provider diagnosis of influenza, final ED electronic medical record (EMR) diagnosis of influenza, and influenza-like illness (ILI) in patients recommended to receive antiviral treatment according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. In addition, we evaluated the compliance with CDC antiviral guidelines.Methods A prospective cohort of adults presenting to a tertiary care ED with an acute respiratory illness who met CDC criteria for recommended antiviral treatment were enrolled and tested for influenza. A clinical diagnosis of influenza was assessed by asking the clinician: "Do you think this patient has influenza?" Influenza-like illness was defined according to current CDC criteria.Results In this cohort of 270 subjects, 42 (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-20%) had influenza. Clinician diagnosis had a sensitivity of 36% (95% CI, 22%-52%) and specificity of 78% (95% CI, 72%-83%); EMR final ED diagnosis had a sensitivity of 26% (95% CI, 14%-42%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%); ILI had a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI, 18%-47%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI, 83%-92%). Only 15 influenza-positive patients (36%) received antiviral treatment.Conclusion Clinician diagnosis, final ED EMR diagnosis, and ILI have low sensitivity for diagnosing influenza, and there is overall poor compliance with CDC antiviral treatment recommendations. Improved methods of influenza diagnosis are needed to help guide management in the clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.008

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dugas, A. F., Valsamakis, A., Atreya, M. R., Thind, K., Alarcon Manchego, P., Faisal, A., Gaydos, C. A., & Rothman, R. E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Dugas, Andrea F.
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
770-775
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1859522205
Cited by
74
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201400007C)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR025006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
influenza diagnosis, diagnosis, influenza-like illness, antiviral therapy, guideline adherence, sensitivity and specificity, acute respiratory illness, emergency department
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, Urban, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review