Cited by 647Influenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections researchPneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Seasonal Influenza in Adults and Children—Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Harper, Scott A., Bradley, John S., Englund, Janet A., File, Thomas M., Gravenstein, Stefan, Hayden, Frederick G., McGeer, Allison J., Neuzil, Kathleen M. +4 more·2009·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Guidelines for the treatment of persons with influenza virus infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The evidence-based guidelines encompass diagnostic issues, treatment and chemoprophylaxis with antiviral medications, and issues related to institutional outbreak management for seasonal (interpandemic) influenza. They are intended for use by physicians in all medical specialties with direct patient care, because influenza virus infection is common in communities during influenza season and may be encountered by practitioners caring for a wide variety of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/598513

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diverse profile of coinfecting pathogens confirms current IDSA recommendations for broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage for influenza-related pneumonia.

    “This diverse profile of coinfecting pathogens confirms current Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommendations for broad‐spectrum antibiotic coverage for influenza‐related pneumonia.63”
  • Our study supports IDSA recommendations for empiric coverage of CA-MRSA in influenza-related pneumonia patients.

    “Given that over 25% of identified isolates were S. aureus, and that approximately 50% of hospital S. aureus isolates are MRSA,64 our study supports IDSA recommendations for empiric coverage of CA‐MRSA in influenza‐related pneumonia patients.63”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harper, S. A., Bradley, J. S., Englund, J. A., File, T. M., Gravenstein, S., Hayden, F. G., McGeer, A. J., Neuzil, K. M., Pavia, A. T., Tapper, M. L., Uyeki, T. M., & Zimmerman, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Summa Health System (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Lenox Hill Hospital (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Harper, Scott A.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2009-04-15
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
1003-1032
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2152015613
Cited by
647
References
230
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 57
FWCI
51.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Keywords
seasonal influenza, influenza, antiviral therapy, chemoprophylaxis, influenza diagnosis, adults, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review