Cited by 99Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

A simple tool to predict admission at the time of triage

Open access

Abstract

Aim: To create and validate a simple clinical score to estimate the probability of admission at the time of triage. Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective, cross-sectional study of triage records for all unscheduled adult attendances in North Glasgow over 2 years. Clinical variables that had significant associations with admission on logistic regression were entered into a mixed-effects multiple logistic model. This provided weightings for the score, which was then simplified and tested on a separate validation group by receiving operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and goodness-of-fit tests. Results: 215 231 presentations were used for model derivation and 107 615 for validation. Variables in the final model showing clinically and statistically significant associations with admission were: triage category, age, National Early Warning Score (NEWS), arrival by ambulance, referral source and admission within the last year. The resulting 6-variable score showed excellent admission/discharge discrimination (area under ROC curve 0.8774, 95% CI 0.8752 to 0.8796). Higher scores also predicted early returns for those who were discharged: the odds of subsequent admission within 28 days doubled for every 7-point increase (log odds=+0.0933 per point, p<0.0001). Conclusions: This simple, 6-variable score accurately estimates the probability of admission purely from triage information. Most patients could accurately be assigned to ‘admission likely’, ‘admission unlikely’, ‘admission very unlikely’ etc., by setting appropriate cut-offs. This could have uses in patient streaming, bed management and decision support. It also has the potential to control for demographics when comparing performance over time or between departments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/emermed-2013-203200

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, A., Rodgers, K., Ireland, A., Jamdar, R., & McKay, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Allan
Venue
Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-01-13
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
174-179
ISSN
  • 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0205
  • 1472-0213
OpenAlex
W2096367109
Cited by
99
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
triage, clinical risk score, National Early Warning Score, ambulance arrival, hospital bed management, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Patient Admission, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Triage, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review