The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The 2001 Bethesda System<SUBTITLE>Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology</SUBTITLE>
Solomon, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114 · Cited by 3,104
Self-citationPersistent Human Papillomavirus Infection as a Predictor of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Schlecht, N. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.24.3106 · Cited by 590
Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study
Cuzick, J., Szarewski, A., Cubie, H., Hulman, G., Kitchener, H., Luesley, D., McGoogan, E., Menon, U., Terry, G., Edwards, R., et al. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14955-0 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Guan, P., Howell‐Jones, R., Li, N., Bruni, L., de Sanjosé, S., Franceschi, S., & Clifford, G. M. (2012) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27485 · Cited by 927
Evidence Regarding Human Papillomavirus Testing in Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Arbyn, M., Ronco, G., Anttila, A., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Poljak, M., Ogilvie, G., Koliopoulos, G., Naucler, P., Sankaranarayanan, R., & Peto, J. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095 · Cited by 897
Human Papillomavirus Testing in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Schiffman, M., Wentzensen, N., Wacholder, S., Kinney, W., Gage, J. C., & Castle, P. E. (2011) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djq562 · Cited by 759
Miller, J. M., Binnicker, M. J., Campbell, S., Carroll, K. C., Chapin, K. C., Gilligan, P. H., Gonzalez, M. D., Jerris, R. C., Kehl, S. C., Patel, R., et al. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy381 · Cited by 641
Baron, E. J., Miller, J. M., Weinstein, M. P., Richter, S. S., Gilligan, P. H., Thomson, R. B., Bourbeau, P., Carroll, K. C., Kehl, S. C., Dunne, W. M., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit278 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, T. C., Massad, L. S., Dunton, C. J., Spitzer, M., Wilkinson, E. J., & Solomon, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 346-355
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155863717
- Cited by
- 841
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 57.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047
- The paper
- Wright, T. C., Massad, L. S., Dunton, C. J., Spitzer, M., Wilkinson, E. J., & Solomon, D. (2007). 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
