Cited by 41Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Goal Attainment After Treatment in Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Open access
Mamik, Mamta M., Rogers, Rebecca G., Qualls, Clifford R., Komesu, Yuko M.·2013·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess differences in goal attainment of self-described goals after treatment of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) for women who chose surgery compared to women who chose pessary; and (2) compare patient global improvement between groups. Study design Women who had symptomatic stage ≥II prolapse presenting for care of POP to the urogynecology clinic at the University of New Mexico were recruited. Patients listed up to 3 goals they had for their treatment. In addition, they completed the short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, and the Body Image Scale. Goals listed by patients were then categorized into 10 categories. Each of the listed goals was categorized based on a consensus of 5 providers. At 3 months' follow-up patients listed if they had met their self-described goals on a scale of 0-10 and also answered the Patient Global Improvement Index (PGI-I). Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups' baseline characteristics. Surgery patients ranked their goal attainment higher than pessary patients for all the 3 goals listed. Similarly, PGI-I scores were also higher in the surgical (2.4 ± 1.1) than the pessary (1.93 ± 0.8) treatment groups (P < .04). Patients in the surgery group also had better symptom improvement as measured by the PFDI-20 (P < .02). Conclusion Patients who chose surgery had better global improvement and met their goals better compared to patients who chose pessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mamik, M. M., Rogers, R. G., Qualls, C. R., & Komesu, Y. M.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Mamik, Mamta M.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
209
Issue
5
Pages
488.e1-488.e5
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042120894
Cited by
40
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000041, UL1TR001449)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000997)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, goal achievement, pessary, pelvic floor surgery, patient-reported outcomes, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, sexual function, body image, treatment selection
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Care Planning, Pessaries, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review