Cited by 37Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

Surgical Management for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Impact on Sexual Function

Thompson, Jennifer C., Rogers, Rebecca G.·2016·Sexual Medicine Reviews

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Female sexual function is complex, incorporating physical, emotional, and psychological factors. Pelvic organ prolapse, descent of the pelvic organs to or through the vaginal opening, is a common condition that affects quality of life, including sexual function. Symptomatic prolapse is most commonly treated with reconstructive surgery. AIM: To address the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and its impact on sexual function and include recommendations for evaluating sexual function, use of validated questionnaires to assess function, preoperative counseling, and postoperative follow-up. METHODS: A literature search was performed for articles evaluating sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Priority was given to larger studies, including systematic reviews, and use of validated questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was postoperative sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair. RESULTS: Multiple surgical approaches are used for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, including native tissue and grafted repairs. An evaluation of sexual function preoperatively is necessary to decide on type of surgery and to establish appropriate postoperative expectations. Postoperatively, most patients report sexual function as improved or unchanged. CONCLUSION: Thorough preoperative counseling allows patients and their physicians to develop appropriate, individualized treatment plans for pelvic organ prolapse that consider women's preoperative sexual function and sexual function goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.02.002

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, J. C., & Rogers, R. G.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Rebecca G.
Venue
Sexual Medicine Reviews
Published
2016-07
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
213-220
ISSN
  • 2050-0513 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-0521
OpenAlex
W2319018686
Cited by
37
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, female sexual function, pelvic organ prolapse surgery, reconstructive surgery, preoperative counseling, postoperative sexual function, Sexual Function Questionnaire, postoperative follow-up
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review