Cited by 80Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome

Open access
Deter, Russell L., Lee, Wesley, Yeo, Lami, Erez, Offer, Ramamurthy, Uma, Naik, Medha, Romero, Roberto·2018·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

&NA; Fetal growth abnormalities can pose significant consequences on perinatal morbidity and mortality of nonanomalous fetuses. The most widely accepted definition of fetal growth restriction is an estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age according to population‐based criteria. However, these criteria do not account for the growth potential of an individual fetus, nor do they effectively separate constitutionally small fetuses from ones that are malnourished. Furthermore, conventional approaches typically evaluate estimated fetal weight at a single time point, rather than using serial scans, to evaluate growth. This article provides a conceptual framework for the individualized growth assessment of a fetus/neonate based on measuring second‐trimester growth velocity of fetal size parameters to estimate growth potential. These estimates specify size models that generate individualized third‐trimester size trajectories and predict birth characteristics. Comparisons of measured and predicted values are used to separate normally growing fetuses from those with growth abnormalities. This can be accomplished with individual anatomical parameters or sets of parameters. A practical and freely available software (Individualized Growth Assessment Program) has been developed to allow implementation of this approach for clinical and research purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.210

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal Macrosomia Obstet Gynecol 2016 128 e195 e209 27776071
  2. [85]Dorland W Dorland’s medical dictionary for health consumers Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deter, R. L., Lee, W., Yeo, L., Erez, O., Ramamurthy, U., Naik, M., & Romero, R.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Deter, Russell L.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
218
Issue
2
Pages
S656-S678
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791970015
Cited by
80
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HSN275201300006C)
  • National Institutes of Health (HSN275201300006C)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HSN275201300006C)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HSN275201300006C, ZIAHD002401)
  • NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
fetal growth restriction, fetal growth rate, growth potential, estimated fetal weight, fetal malnutrition, birth weight prediction
MeSH terms
Child Development, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Fetal Macrosomia, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Fetal Weight, Fetal Development, Growth Charts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review