Cited by 23Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingTreatment of Major Depression

A Chinese adaptation of six items, self-report Hamilton Depression Scale: Factor structure and psychometric properties

Wang, Xue-Mei, Ma, Hai-Yan, Zhong, Jing, Huang, Xiao-Jie, Yang, Cheng-Jia, Sheng, Dong-Fang, Xu, Ming-Zhi·2022·Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this research was to verify the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese Adaptation of self-report HAMD-6.Methods Outpatients and inpatients who met the DSM-5 criterion for major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated by the Chinese self-report HAMD-6, seventeen items of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) and Improved Clinical Global Impression Scale (iCGI-S). The internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, criterion validity and construct validity of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6 were tested. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlativity between the total score and the item scores. By drawing the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve, the best cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity of Chinese Adaptation self-report HAMD-6 were obtained.Results Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6 was 0.91, and the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) of retest reliability was 0.81(P < 0.01). The Spearman correlation coefficients of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6, Chinese clinician version of HAMD-6, PHQ-9 and HAMD-17 were 0.86, 0.81 and 0.86, respectively (all P < 0.01). Results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a unidimensional construct. In addition, HAMD-17 ≤ 7 and iCGI-S= 1 were taken as the remission criteria for depression disorder, and the ROC curves of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6 were plotted with a cut-off value of 3/4, the specificity and sensitivity were 0.85/0.92 and 0.96/0.93 respectively.Conclusion These results suggested that the abbreviated Chinese self-report HAMD-6 has good reliability and validity among the Chinese population. This study suggested that the remission cut-off value of the scale is 3/4.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103104

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X.-M., Ma, H.-Y., Zhong, J., Huang, X.-J., Yang, C.-J., Sheng, D.-F., & Xu, M.-Z.
Affiliations
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
Venue
Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
73
Pages
103104
ISSN
1876-2018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224233835
Cited by
23
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Chinese adaptation, major depressive disorder, depression assessment, psychometric properties, factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, depression remission, cut-off values, PHQ-9
MeSH terms
China, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review