Cited by 49Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Application of filamentous fungi in microalgae-based wastewater remediation for biomass harvesting and utilization: from mechanisms to practical application

Lin, Weizhong, Chen, Lining, Tan, Zexing, Deng, Zhenqi, Liu, Hui·2022·Algal Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102614

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, W., Chen, L., Tan, Z., Deng, Z., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • South China Institute Of Environmental Sciences (CN)
  • Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Hui
Venue
Algal Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
62
Pages
102614
ISSN
2211-9264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206751476
Cited by
49
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Algal Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
filamentous fungi, microalgae, wastewater remediation, co-culture, nutrient removal, biomass harvesting, biomass utilization, nutrient recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review