Cited by 647Algal biology and biofuel productionCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Microalgae Harvesting Techniques: A Review

Singh, Gulab, Patidar, S.K.·2018·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Microalgae with wide range of commercial applications have attracted a lot of attention of the researchers in the last few decades. However, microalgae utilization is not economically sustainable due to high cost of harvesting. A wide range of solid - liquid separation techniques are available for microalgae harvesting. The techniques include coagulation and flocculation, flotation, centrifugation and filtration or a combination of various techniques. Despite the importance of harvesting to the economics and energy balance, there is no universal harvesting technique for microalgae. Therefore, this review focuses on assessing technical, economical and application potential of various harvesting techniques so as to allow selection of an appropriate technology for cost effectively harvesting of microalgae from their culture medium. Various harvesting and concentrating techniques of microalgae were reviewed to suggest order of suitability of the techniques for four main microalgae applications i.e biofuel, human and animal food, high valued products, and water quality restoration. For deciding the order of suitability, a comparative analysis of various harvesting techniques based on the six common criterions (i.e biomass quality, cost, biomass quantity, processing time, species specific and toxicity) has been done. Based on the order of various techniques vis-a-vis various criteria and preferred order of criteria for various applications, order of suitability of harvesting techniques for various applications has been decided. Among various harvesting techniques, coagulation and flocculation, centrifugation and filtration were found to be most suitable for considered applications. These techniques may be used alone or in combination for increasing the harvesting efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.010

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, 90% of the cost of obtaining microalgal biomass from open ponds is attributable to energy-intensive harvesting techniques.

    “Currently, 90% of the cost of obtaining microalgal biomass from open ponds is attributable to energy-intensive harvesting techniques such as flotation, centrifugation, filtration, and electricity-based techniques [132,133].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, G., & Patidar, S. K.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Gulab
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
217
Pages
499-508
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795584168
Cited by
647
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 7
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
UGC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae harvesting, solid-liquid separation, coagulation-flocculation, flotation, centrifugation, filtration, biofuels, high-value products, water remediation, harvesting costs
MeSH terms
Culture Media, Flocculation, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review