Cited by 342Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Attempting to lose weight

Kruger, Judy, Galuska, Deborah A, Serdula, Mary K, Jones, Deborah A·2004·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Americans spend over $33 billion annually on weight-loss products and services. Although weight-control methods are of considerable public health interest, few national data on weight-loss practices are available. This paper examines the prevalence of specific weight-loss practices among U.S. adults trying to lose weight.Methods Data from the 1998 National Health Interview Survey, which was conducted through face-to-face interviews of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (n =32,440), were analyzed in 2003.Results Twenty-four percent of men and 38% of women were trying to lose weight. Attempting weight loss was less common among normal weight (body mass index [BMI]<25 kg/m(2)) people (6% men, 24% women) than overweight (BMI>/=25 to 30 kg/m(2)) people (28%, 49%) or obese (BMI>/=30 kg/m(2)) people (50%, 58%). Among those trying to lose weight, the most common strategies were eating fewer calories (58% men, 63% women); eating less fat (49%, 56%); and exercising more (54%, 52%). Less frequent strategies were skipping meals (11% men, 9% women); eating food supplements (5%, 6%); joining a weight-loss program (3%, 5%); taking diet pills (2%, 3%); taking water pills or diuretics (1%, 2%); or fasting for >/=24 hours (0.6%, 0.7%). Only one third of all those trying to lose weight reported eating fewer calories and exercising more.Conclusions Increased efforts are needed among all those trying to lose weight to promote effective strategies for weight loss, including the use of calorie reduction and increased physical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.001

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruger, J., Galuska, D. A., Serdula, M. K., & Jones, D. A.
Affiliations
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US)
Corresponding author
Kruger, Judy
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
402-406
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058626103
Cited by
342
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 30
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight loss, weight loss practices, obesity, overweight, calorie reduction, physical activity, dietary fat restriction, meal skipping, weight loss supplements, diuretics, fasting, sex differences, body mass index, weight control strategies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Appetite Depressants, Energy Intake, Cathartics, Diet, Reducing, Diuretics, Educational Status, Feeding Behavior, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Sex Factors, United States, Vomiting, Weight Loss, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Age Distribution, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Dietary Supplements, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review