Cited by 114Obesity and Health PracticesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Perceived judgment about weight can negatively influence weight loss: A cross-sectional study of overweight and obese patients

Open access
Gudzune, Kimberly A., Bennett, Wendy L., Cooper, Lisa A., Bleich, Sara N.·2014·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective To examine the association between patient-perceived judgments about weight by primary care providers (PCPs) and self-reported weight loss. Methods We conducted a national internet-based survey of 600 adults engaged in primary care with a body mass index (BMI)≥25 kg/m(2) in 2012. Our weight loss outcomes included attempted weight loss and achieved ≥10% weight loss in the last 12 months. Our independent variable was "feeling judged about my weight by my PCP." We created an interaction between perceiving judgment and PCP discussing weight loss as an independent variable. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for patient and PCP factors using survey weights. Results Overall, 21% perceived that their PCP judged them about their weight. Respondents who perceived judgment were significantly more likely to attempt weight loss [odds ratios (OR) 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96-11.14]. They were not more likely to achieve ≥10% weight loss [OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.42-1.76]. Among patients whose PCPs discussed weight loss, 20.1% achieved ≥10% weight loss if they did not perceive judgment by their PCP as compared to 13.5% who perceived judgment. Conclusions Weight loss discussions between patients and PCPs may lead to greater weight loss in relationships where patients do not perceive judgment about their weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients are more likely to lose weight when clinicians communicate using a supportive, nonjudgmental approach.

    “Patients are also more likely to lose weight when clinicians communicate using a supportive, nonjudgmental approach.36”

    From Obesity Management in Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Amy NK Aalborg A Lyons P Keranen L Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women Int J Obes (Lond) 2006 30 147 55 16231037
  2. Beck RS Daughtridge R Sloane PD Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review J Am Board Fam Pract 2002 15 25 38 11841136
  3. Bleich SN Gudzune KA Bennett WL Jarlenski M Cooper LA How does physician BMI impact patient trust and perceived stigma? Prev Med 2013 57 120 4 23743418 PMC3745018
  4. Block JP DeSalvo KB Fisher WP Are physicians equipped to address the obesity epidemic? Knowledge and attitudes of internal medicine residents Prev Med 2003 36 669 75 12744909
  5. Cummings P Methods for estimating adjusted risk ratios Stata Journal 2009 9 175 96
  6. Dwamena F Holmes-Rovner M Gaulden CM Jorgenson S Sadigh G Sikorskii A Interventions for providers to promote patient-center approach in clinical consultations Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 12 CD003267 23235595 PMC9947219
  7. Ghods BK Roter DL Ford DE Larson S Arbelaez JJ Cooper LA Patient-physician communication in primary care visits with African-Americans and whites with depression J Gen Intern Med 2008 23 600 6 18264834 PMC2324146
  8. Gudzune KA Clark JM Appel LJ Bennett WL Primary care providers’ communication with patients during weight counseling: a focus group study Patient Educ Couns 2012 89 152 7 22819710 PMC3462265
  9. Gudzune KA Beach MC Roter DL Cooper LA Physicians build less rapport with obese patients Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013 21 2146 52 23512862 PMC3694993
  10. Gudzune KA Bleich SN Richards TM Weiner JP Hodges K Clark JM Doctor shopping my overweight and obese patients is associated with increased healthcare utilization Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013 21 1328 34 23671015 PMC3742565
  11. Hojat M Louis DZ Markham FW Wender R Rabinowitz CG Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients Acad Med 2011 86 359 64 21248604
  12. Huizinga MM Cooper LA Bleich SN Clark JM Beach CM Physician respect for patients with obesity J Gen Intern Med 2009 24 1236 1239 19763700 PMC2771236
  13. Jay M Gillespie C Ark T Do internists, pediatricians, and psychiatrists feel competent in obesity care?: using a needs assessment to drive curriculum design J Gen Intern Med 2008 23 1066 70 18612746 PMC2517928
  14. Johnson RL Roter D Powe NR Cooper LA Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits Am J Public Health 2004 94 2084 90 15569958 PMC1448596
  15. Keeter S Miller C Kohut A Groves RM Presser S Consequences of reducing non-response in a national telephone survey Public Opinion Quarterly 2000 64 125 48 10984330
  16. LeBlanc ES O’Conner E Whitlock EP Patnode CD Kapka T Effectiveness of primary care – relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 2011 155 434 47 21969342
  17. McTigue KM Harris R Hemphill B Lux L Sutton S Bunton AJ Lohr KN Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 2003 139 933 49 14644897
  18. Merrill RM Richardson JS Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2006 Prev Chronic Dis 2009 6 A121 19754997 PMC2774635
  19. Moyer VA Screening for and Management of Obesity in Adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Ann Intern Med 2012 157 373 8 22733087
  20. NIH, NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report 1998 (NIH Publication No. 98-4098) 9813653
  21. Pollak KI Alexander SC Coffman CJ Tulsky JA Lyna P Dolor RJ Physical communication techniques and weight loss in adults: Project CHAT Am J Prev Med 2010 39 321 8 20837282 PMC2939864
  22. Puhl R Brownell KD Bias, discrimination, and obesity Obes Res 2001 9 788 805 11743063
  23. Puhl RM Brownell KD Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006 14 1802 15 17062811
  24. Rose SA Poynter PS Anderson JW Noar SM Conigliaro J Physician weight loss advice and patient weight loss behavior change: a literature review and meta-analysis of survey data Int J Obes (Lond) 2013 37 118 28 22450855
  25. Roter D Hall JA Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits, second edition 2006 Praeger Publishers Westport, CT
  26. Smith AW Borowski LA Liu B U.S. primary care physicians’ diet-, physical activity-, and weight-related care of adult patients Am J Prev Med 2011 41 33 42 21665061 PMC3142674
  27. Sorenson TI Stunkard AJ Teasdale TW Higgins MW The accuracy of reports of weight: children’s recall of their parents’ weights 15 years earlier Int J Obese 1983 7 115 22 6862758
  28. Stunkard AJ Sorensen T Schulsinger F Kety SS Rowland LP Sidman RL Matthysse SW Use of a Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders 1983 115 20 Raven Press New York, NY
  29. Zhao G Ford ES Li C Mokdad AH Weight control behaviors in overweight/obese U.S. adults with diagnosed hypertension and diabetes Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009 6 13 19267925 PMC2657116

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gudzune, K. A., Bennett, W. L., Cooper, L. A., & Bleich, S. N.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Gudzune, Kimberly A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
62
Pages
103-107
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088286180
Cited by
114
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
21.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's (NHLBI) Center for Population Health and Health Disparities (P50HL0105187, K23HL116601, K23HL098476, K24HL083113, K01HL096409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight loss, weight stigma, primary care providers, overweight, obesity, body mass index, weight loss outcomes, patient-provider relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Negativism, Obesity, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Overweight, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review