The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promise of and Potential for Patient-Facing Technologies to Enable Meaningful Use
Open accessAbstract
Patients are using healthcare technologies for a variety of reasons. Recently, the Meaningful-Use rule was released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, providing some initial guidance for patient-facing technologies. There needs to be more of an understanding of patients' needs and how these technologies can be utilized effectively. This article provides a framework for organizing patient-facing technologies into categories of meaningful use, and how these technologies can improve healthcare quality, safety, and population health. Barriers to achieving meaningful use of HIT and unintended consequences of patient-facing technologies are discussed. The success of healthcare reform is predicated on achieving improved health outcomes and reduced costs, which can be accomplished only by activating patients to become more engaged in their own care. Patient-facing technologies are likely to play a critical role in supporting patients to become more informed and activated and may also improve efficiencies. Further research is needed to identify the most useful and effective technologies for patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease
Murray, E., Burns, J., Tai, S. S., Lai, R., & Nazareth, I. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004274.pub2 · Cited by 56
RetractedCrossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,779
Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x · Cited by 2,748
The Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their Potential
Bennett, G. G., & Glasgow, R. E. (2009) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235 · Cited by 800
Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease
Murray, E., Burns, J., See Tai, S., Lai, R., & Nazareth, I. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004274.pub4 · Cited by 722
Tate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.14.1833 · Cited by 666
Green, B. B. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.24.2857 · Cited by 653
Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure
Inglis, S. C., Clark, R. A., McAlister, F. A., Ball, J., Lewinter, C., Cullington, D., Stewart, S., & Cleland, J. G. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007228.pub2 · Cited by 614
Sharing Health Data for Better Outcomes on PatientsLikeMe
Wicks, P., Massagli, M., Frost, J., Brownstein, C., Okun, S., Vaughan, T., Bradley, R., & Heywood, J. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1549 · Cited by 603
Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system
Gustafson, D. (1999) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00108-1 · Cited by 461
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Fox, 2009, The social life of health information: Americans' pursuit of health takes place within a widening network of both online and offline sources, Pew Internet & American Life
- Dyson, 2009, Why participatory medicine?, Journal of Participatory Medicine, 1
- Woods, 2010, VA Rural Health Research Conference, Portland ME
- Ahern, 2009, eHealth for employee health and wellness: optimizing plan design and incentive management, in ACSM's Worksite Health Handbook: a guide to building healthy and productive companies, Human Kinetics, Inc, 248
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review
Irizarry, T., DeVito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4255 · Cited by 732
Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health
Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., Callahan, B., & Siefer, A. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8 · Cited by 597
Kuhn, T., Basch, P., Barr, M., & Yackel, T. R. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2128 · Cited by 272
Newell, S., & Jordan, Z. (2015) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072 · Cited by 187
Clinician behaviors in telehealth care delivery: a systematic review
Henry, B. W., Block, D. E., Ciesla, J. R., McGowan, B. A., & Vozenilek, J. A. (2016) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9717-2 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahern, D. K., Woods, S. S., Lightowler, M. C., Finley, S. W., & Houston, T. K.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Westat (United States) (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ahern, David K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- S162-S172
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156794561
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 23.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- meaningful use, health information technology, patient engagement, patient activation, quality of care, patient safety, population health, health care reform, unintended consequences, patient-centered care
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Medical Informatics, Patient Participation, Quality of Health Care, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., Health Care Reform, Consumer Health Information, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
