Cited by 732Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review

Open access
Irizarry, Taya, DeVito Dabbs, Annette, Curran, Christine R·2015·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement. METHODS: We reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms "patient portal" OR "personal health record" OR "electronic personal health record". Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality. RESULTS: We found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Current research has demonstrated that patients' interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient's ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients' and providers' information needs and functionality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.4255

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [116]Schnipper Jeffrey L Gandhi Tejal K Wald Jonathan S Grant Richard W Poon Eric G Volk Lynn A Businger Alexandra Williams Deborah H Siteman Elizabeth Buckel Lauren Middleton Blackford Effects of an online personal health record on medication accuracy and safety: a cluster-randomized trial J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012 19 5 728 34 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000723 22556186 amiajnl-2011-000723 22556186 PMC3422826 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irizarry, T., DeVito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Irizarry, Taya
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2015-06-23
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
e148
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1884436451
Cited by
732
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (2NR008857, T32NR008857)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
patient portals, patient engagement, electronic personal health records, patient adoption, health literacy, usability, patient decision-making, caregiver role, patient information needs
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Educational Status, Ethnicity, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Status, Humans, Patient Participation, Research, Caregivers, Health Records, Personal, Health Literacy, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review