Cited by 614Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure

Open access
Inglis, Sally C, Clark, Robyn A, McAlister, Finlay A, Ball, Jocasta, Lewinter, Christian, Cullington, Damien, Stewart, Simon, Cleland, John GF·2010·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specialised disease management programmes for chronic heart failure (CHF) improve survival, quality of life and reduce healthcare utilisation. The overall efficacy of structured telephone support or telemonitoring as an individual component of a CHF disease management strategy remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVES: To review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of structured telephone support or telemonitoring compared to standard practice for patients with CHF in order to quantify the effects of these interventions over and above usual care for these patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA) on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and Science Citation Index Expanded and Conference Citation Index on ISI Web of Knowledge) and various search engines were searched from 2006 to November 2008 to update a previously published non-Cochrane review. Bibliographies of relevant studies and systematic reviews and abstract conference proceedings were handsearched. No language limits were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only peer reviewed, published RCTs comparing structured telephone support or telemonitoring to usual care of CHF patients were included. Unpublished abstract data was included in sensitivity analyses. The intervention or usual care could not include a home visit or more than the usual (four to six weeks) clinic follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause and CHF-related hospitalisations which were meta-analysed using fixed effects models. Other outcomes included length of stay, quality of life, acceptability and cost and these were described and tabulated. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-five studies and five published abstracts were included. Of the 25 full peer-reviewed studies meta-analysed, 16 evaluated structured telephone support (5613 participants), 11 evaluated telemonitoring (2710 participants), and two tested both interventions (included in counts). Telemonitoring reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.81, P < 0.0001) with structured telephone support demonstrating a non-significant positive effect (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.01, P = 0.08). Both structured telephone support (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87, P < 0.0001) and telemonitoring (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94, P = 0.008) reduced CHF-related hospitalisations. For both interventions, several studies improved quality of life, reduced healthcare costs and were acceptable to patients. Improvements in prescribing, patient knowledge and self-care, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were observed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Structured telephone support and telemonitoring are effective in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and CHF-related hospitalisations in patients with CHF; they improve quality of life, reduce costs, and evidence-based prescribing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd007228.pub2

Cites

325 of 325 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Cochrane review of chronic heart failure reported a small significant reduction in all-cause hospitalisations for structured telephone support compared with usual care (relative risk 0.9, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0) and for telemonitoring compared with usual care (relative risk 0.9, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.0).

    “the Cochrane review of chronic heart failure reported a small significant reduction in all-cause hospitalisations for both structured telephone support compared with usual care (relative risk 0.9 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.0) and for telemonitoring compared with usual care (relative risk 0.9 (95% C.I. 0.8 to 1.0) [46].”
  • In the same Cochrane review, telemonitoring resulted in a significant relative risk of 0.66 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.81) for all-cause mortality.

    “and telemonitoring resulted in a significant relative risk of 0.66 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.81).”
  • In a Cochrane review, pooling all-cause mortality data from 15 studies, structured telephone support resulted in a non-significant relative risk of 0.88 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.01).

    “In the pooling of all-cause mortality data from 15 studies structured telephone support resulted in a non-significant relative risk of 0.88 (95% C.I. 0.76 to 1.01) [46]”
  • In terms of chronic heart failure related hospitalisations, both structured telephone support (relative risk 0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9) and telemonitoring (relative risk 0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9) demonstrated significant reductions.

    “In terms of chronic heart failure related hospitalisations, again both structured telephone support (relative risk 0.8, 95% C.I. 0.7 to 0.9) and telemonitoring (relative risk 0.8, 95% C.I. 0.7 to 0.9) demonstrated significant reductions [46].”
  • The Cochrane review of heart failure reported that quality of life was a secondary outcome for 15 studies, with nine studies reporting improvement in quality of life.

    “The Cochrane review of heart failure reported that quality of life was a secondary outcome for 15 studies altogether, with nine studies reporting improvement in quality of life [46].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 331 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pasqualini 2006 {published data only} Pasqualini MF, Monopoli DM, Mazzucco R, Negrelli M, Pozzetti D, Sandrini R, et al.P876 Home management of old patients with chronic heart diseases: role of tele-cardiolography and tele consultancy. European Heart Journal 2006;27(Suppl 1):140.
  2. Reble 2006 {published data only} Reble C, Jensen M, Schneider K, Koots S, Crisman T. Impact of heart failure tele-management program on patient outcomes. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing 2006;21(2):113.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inglis, S. C., Clark, R. A., McAlister, F. A., Ball, J., Lewinter, C., Cullington, D., Stewart, S., & Cleland, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2010-08-04
Issue
8
Pages
CD007228-CD007228
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097377402
Cited by
614
References
331
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 70
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
chronic heart failure, telephone support, remote patient monitoring, disease management programs, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, quality of life, health care utilization, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, usual care comparison, telehealth intervention, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Quality of Life, Telemetry, Telephone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review