Cited by 15Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Prior arrest, substance use, mental disorder, and intent-specific firearm injury.

Mills, Brianna M., Nurius, Paula S., Matsueda, Ross L., Rivara, Frederick P., Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali·2018·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Substance use, mental disorders, and arrest are markers of increased firearm injury risk. It is unclear how these markers vary by intent. Examining these interrelated factors together can clarify their associations with assault-related, self-inflicted, unintentional, and legal intervention firearm injuries, informing intent-specific interventions. Methods In 2017-2018, 2-year diagnosis and arrest histories of intent-specific firearm injury cases were compared with those of unintentionally injured motor vehicle collision passenger controls. Fatal and nonfatal firearm and motor vehicle collision injury records in Seattle (2010-2014) were linked to statewide hospitalization and arrest records. Multinomial logistic regression models compared odds of prior arrest, substance use, and mental disorder diagnoses among intent-specific firearm injury cases relative to controls, adjusting for age, race, and gender. Results A total of 763 cases and 335 controls were identified. Unintentional and self-inflicted cases did not differ significantly from controls in arrest history. Legal intervention cases resembled assault-related cases in their arrest history, and self-inflicted cases in their hospitalization history. The legal intervention cases were more likely than controls to have a prior felony arrest (OR=7.72, 95% CI=2.63, 20.97), and diagnoses involving alcohol (OR=4.06, 95% CI=1.04, 15.84); cannabis (OR=11.00, 95% CI=1.01, 119.36); depression/anxiety (OR=7.22, 95% CI=1.8…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.041

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have found half of firearm injured patients had an arrest in the prior 2 years.

    “other studies which have found half of firearm injured patients had an arrest in the prior 2 years [12].”

    From Firearm injuries in Missouri (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, B. M., Nurius, P. S., Matsueda, R. L., Rivara, F. P., & Rowhani-Rahbar, A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Mills, Brianna M.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
298-307
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886955584
Cited by
15
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Injury Prevention Research Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
firearm injuries, unintentional firearm injury, prior arrests, substance use, mental illness, cannabis use, anxiety and depression, psychosis, conduct disorder, alcohol consumption, injury risk factors
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cause of Death, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Wounds, Gunshot, Self-Injurious Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, Law Enforcement, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review