Cited by 113Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart rate and cardiovascular healthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Comparison of four single-drug regimens on ventricular rate and arrhythmia-related symptoms in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

Ulimoen, Sara R., Enger, Steve, Carlson, Jonas, Platonov, Pyotr G., Pripp, Are H., Abdelnoor, Michael, Arnesen, Harald, Gjesdal, Knut +1 more·2013·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a main treatment modality. However, data are scarce on the relative efficacy of calcium channel blockers and β blockers or between drugs within each class. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of 4 rate-reducing, once-daily drug regimens on the ventricular heart rate and arrhythmia-related symptoms in patients with permanent AF. We included 60 patients (mean age 71 ± 9 years, 18 women) with permanent AF in an investigator-blind cross-over study. Diltiazem 360 mg/day, verapamil 240 mg/day, metoprolol 100 mg/day, and carvedilol 25 mg/day were administered for 3 weeks in a randomized sequence. The 24-hour heart rate was measured using Holter monitoring, and arrhythmia-related symptoms were assessed using the Symptom Checklist questionnaire before randomization and on the last day of each treatment period. The 24-hour mean heart rate was 96 ± 12 beats/min at baseline (no treatment), 75 ± 10 beats/min with diltiazem, 81 ± 11 beats/min with verapamil, 82 ± 11 beats/min with metoprolol, and 84 ± 11 beats/min with carvedilol. All drugs reduced the heart rate compared to baseline (p <0.001 for all). The 24-hour heart rate was significantly lower with diltiazem than with any other drug tested (p <0.001 for all). Compared to baseline, diltiazem significantly reduced both the frequency (p <0.001) and the severity (p = 0.005) of symptoms. In contrast, verapamil reduced symptom frequency only (p = 0.012). In conclusion, diltiazem 360 mg/day was the most effective drug regimen for reducing the heart rate in patients with permanent AF. Arrhythmia-related symptoms were reduced by treatment with the calcium channel blockers diltiazem and verapamil, but not by the β blockers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.020

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ulimoen, S. R., Enger, S., Carlson, J., Platonov, P. G., Pripp, A. H., Abdelnoor, M., Arnesen, H., Gjesdal, K., & Tveit, A.
Affiliations
  • Vestre Viken Hospital Trust (NO)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Ulimoen, Sara R.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
225-230
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035457614
Cited by
113
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
permanent atrial fibrillation, rate control, ventricular rate, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, diltiazem, verapamil, metoprolol, carvedilol, 24-hour heart rate
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Calcium Channel Blockers, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Rate, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review