Cited by 48Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart rate and cardiovascular healthHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Chronic atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of medical heart rate control management

Nikolaidou, T, Channer, K S·2009·Postgraduate Medical Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology (ACC/AHA/ESC) on rate control management for chronic atrial fibrillation have relegated digoxin to second line treatment, recommending instead the use of beta-blockers or rate limiting calcium antagonists as first line treatment. The objective of this review is to assess the efficacy of these drugs in controlling heart rate, and in improving symptoms and exercise tolerance. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases, hand searched journals and relevant bibliographies for articles. SELECTION OF STUDIES: We included all study designs evaluating or comparing oral digoxin, beta-blockers and calcium antagonists, alone or in combination, for rate control in chronic atrial fibrillation. 46 studies satisfied our inclusion and quality criteria. RESULTS: Published studies are small and too heterogeneous to be quantitatively combined. Descriptive synthesis of the data shows little evidence that monotherapy with beta-blockers or calcium antagonists improves symptoms or exercise capacity in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Instead it is associated with dose related side effects. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited data available, we conclude that the combination of digoxin with either a beta-blocker or calcium antagonist should be first line management in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/pgmj.2008.068908

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with stroke prevention and rhythm control, very little robust evidence exists to inform the best type and intensity of rate control treatment, with the majority of data derived from short-term crossover trials and observational studies.

    “Compared with stroke prevention and rhythm control, very little robust evidence exists to inform the best type and intensity of rate control treatment, with the majority of data derived from short-term crossover trials and observational studies.41,[526][527][528]”
  • Verapamil or diltiazem can improve arrhythmia-related symptoms.

    “Verapamil or diltiazem can improve arrhythmia-related symptoms, 526 in comparison with beta-blockers, which reduced exercise capacity and increased B-type natriuretic peptide in one small trial of low-risk patients with preserved LVEF.542”
  • Comparisons with other rate control therapies are based on small, short-duration studies that identify no or marginal differences in exercise capacity, quality of life, or LVEF compared to digoxin.

    “Comparisons with other rate control therapies are based on small, short-duration studies that identify no or marginal differences in exercise capacity, quality of life, or LVEF compared to digoxin.526,[554][555][556][557][558]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikolaidou, T., & Channer, K. S.
Affiliations
Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Nikolaidou, T
Venue
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
85
Issue
1004
Pages
303-312
ISSN
  • 0032-5473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0756
OpenAlex
W2102658369
Cited by
48
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Postgraduate Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
chronic atrial fibrillation, rate control, digoxin, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, combination therapy, exercise tolerance, symptom improvement, adverse drug reactions, first-line therapy
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Calcium Channel Blockers, Chronic Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Digoxin, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review