Cited by 55Healthcare cost, quality, practicesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients: Prevalence, causes and interventions

Open access
Vrijsen, B.E.L., Naaktgeboren, C.A., Vos, L.M., van Solinge, W.W., Kaasjager, H.A.H., ten Berg, M.J.·2020·Annals of Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce overutilization of laboratory testing many interventions have been tried, but selecting the most effective intervention for a given setting is challenging. To be sustainable, interventions need to align with healthcare providers' needs and daily practices. This study aimed to assess the extent of overutilization and the perspectives of healthcare providers, which may be used to guide the choice of intervention. METHODS: The extent of inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients was evaluated using a database. Surveys and focus groups were used to investigate healthcare providers' perceptions on its causes and solutions. RESULTS: On average, patients had 5.7 laboratory orders done during the first week of admission, whereas guidelines advise performing laboratory testing no more than twice per week. Repeat testing of normal test results occurred in up to 85% of patients. The frequency of laboratory testing was underestimated by survey responders, even though the majority of responders (78%) thought that laboratory tests are ordered too frequently. Residents were considered to be most responsible for laboratory test ordering.The primary causes of overutilization discussed were personal factors, such as a lack of awareness and knowledge, as well as feelings of insecurity. Regarding possible solutions, residents generally recommended educational interventions, whereas specialists tended to favour technical solutions such as lockouts. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate laboratory testing is common in internal medicine. The most important causes are a lack of awareness and knowledge, especially in residents. The intervention most favoured by residents is education, suggesting educational interventions may be most applicable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.002

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vrijsen, B. E. L., Naaktgeboren, C. A., Vos, L. M., van Solinge, W. W., Kaasjager, H. A. H., & ten Berg, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vrijsen, B.E.L.
Venue
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Published
2020-03
Volume
51
Pages
48-53
ISSN
2049-0801 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004662576
Cited by
55
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
inappropriate laboratory testing, medical inpatients, healthcare provider perceptions, residents (medical training), lockouts, educational intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review