Cited by 23Healthcare cost, quality, practicesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlElectronic Health Records Systems

Lab testing overload: a comprehensive analysis of overutilization in hospital-based settings

Open access
Shaik, Tanveer, Mahmood, Ramsha, Kanagala, Sai Gautham, Kaur, Harmanjit, Mendpara, Vaidehi, Gupta, Vasu, Aggarwal, Priyanka, Anamika, Fnu +2 more·2024·Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings

Abstract

Overuse of laboratory tests has been a growing problem in the inpatient hospital setting for years, which adds to the rising cost of care. Various factors come into play, such as clinical routines, lack of cost transparency, and the convenience of electronic health record-based ordering. The financial ramifications of the overuse are significant, as lab costs drive most medical decisions. Eliminating unnecessary testing with clinical decision support and best practices is associated with marked cost savings, improved outcomes, and decreased patient distress. The excessive use of laboratory tests highly affects patients, resulting in hospital-induced anemia, low patient satisfaction, and poor outcomes. Tackling lab overuse requires a multifaceted approach that includes education, technology, and policy changes. In the era of precision healthcare, optimizing test utilization can reduce costs, decrease waste, and improve patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08998280.2023.2288788

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaik, T., Mahmood, R., Kanagala, S. G., Kaur, H., Mendpara, V., Gupta, V., Aggarwal, P., Anamika, F., Garg, N., & Jain, R.
Affiliations
  • Avalon University School of Medicine (CW)
  • Metropolitan Hospital Center (US)
  • St. Elizabeth's Medical Center (US)
  • Government Medical College (IN)
  • Dayanand Medical College & Hospital (IN)
  • Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN)
  • University College of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Children's Hospital of Michigan (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jain, Rohit
Venue
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
Published
2023-12-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
312-316
ISSN
  • 0899-8280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3252
OpenAlex
W4389305555
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
inpatient laboratory testing, hospital costs, clinical decision support, cost transparency, patient satisfaction, precision medicine, medical waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review