Cited by 73Air Quality and Health ImpactsDermatology and Skin DiseasesAsthma and respiratory diseases

Adult atopic dermatitis and exposure to air pollutants—a nationwide population-based study

Tang, Kuo-Tung, Ku, Kai-Chen, Chen, Der-Yuan, Lin, Ching-Heng, Tsuang, Ben-Jei, Chen, Yi-Hsing·2017·Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Abstract

Background There is a trend toward an increased worldwide prevalence of allergic diseases. It is speculated that industrialization with resultant air pollution plays a role. However, there are sparse epidemiologic data on the relation between air pollution and atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults.Objective To investigate the relation between exposure to air pollutants and adult AD in a cross-sectional study based on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan.Methods We identified 1,023 adult patients with AD and 4,092 age- and sex-matched controls without allergic diseases in 2011. Using data from 71 Environmental Protection Agency monitoring stations across Taiwan, levels of exposure to air pollutants were determined by the location of a subject's place of residence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, levels of urbanization, and family income, was performed.Results We found an association between particulate matter <2.5 μm in diameter or the Pollutant Standards Index (the highest sub-index of the concentrations of 5 main air pollutants after transformation) and the development of adult AD. The adjusted odds ratios were 1.05 (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.08) and 1.02 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.03), respectively.Conclusion These results demonstrated that air pollution, represented by particulate matter <2.5 μm in diameter or the Pollutant Standards Index, was modestly associated with the development of AD in adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anai.2016.12.005

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across epidemiological studies, evidence regarding the relationship between air pollution and skin diseases remains fragmented and difficult to interpret, and a majority of studies yield inconclusive evidence.

    “Because of substantial variability in research designs, statistical methods, exposure and outcome assessments, geographic regions, and other factors, across epidemiological studies, the evidence regarding the relationship between AP and skin diseases remains fragmented and difficult to interpret, and a majority of studies yield inconclusive evidence [17–21].”
  • Other studies reported male individuals at higher risk of developing atopic dermatitis with association with PM.

    “While some studies reported women at a higher risk of developing AD on exposure to air pollutants [32, 49, 59, 60], other studies reported male individuals at higher risk of developing AD with association with PM [20, 61].”
  • Skin phenotypes result from the interplay of a wide range of different exposomal and genetic factors.

    “Skin phenotypes result from the interplay of a wide range of different exposomal and genetic factors [20].”
  • PM2.5 is significantly associated with the development and exacerbation of skin diseases such as AD.

    “Recent meta-analysis (21) and epidemiologic studies (22, 23) showed PM2.5 is significantly associated with the development and the exacerbation of skin diseases such as AD.”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

  • PM2.5 is considered more harmful than PM10.

    “the latter of which is considered more harmful, 58”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, K.-T., Ku, K.-C., Chen, D.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Tsuang, B.-J., & Chen, Y.-H.
Affiliations
  • National Chung Hsing University (TW)
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Yi-Hsing
Venue
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
118
Issue
3
Pages
351-355
ISSN
1081-1206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582755369
Cited by
73
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
adult atopic dermatitis, air pollution, allergic diseases, industrialization, residential air pollution exposure, Taiwan
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dermatitis, Atopic, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Taiwan, Urbanization, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review