CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Avian ecology and behaviorPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Why does diurnal mass change not appear to affect the flight performance of alarmed birds?

Macleod, Ross·2006·Animal Behaviour
DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.020

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diurnal mass gains of 5.3% in great tits have been shown to have no significant effect on escape flight performance.

    “Diurnal mass gains of 5.3% in great tits have also been shown to have no significant effect on escape flight performance (Macleod, 2006).”

    From The elaborate plumage in peacocks is not such a drag (2014) · cites this paper as Macleod, 2006

  • Although added mass must affect induced power requirements, the size of that effect has little meaningful functional relevance given the high variability in individual take-off performance.

    “Together, these findings suggest that although added mass must affect the induced power requirements, the magnitude of the effect has little meaningful functional relevance (given the high variability in individual take-off performance per se; Table 2, Fig. 1A) (Macleod, 2006).”

    From The elaborate plumage in peacocks is not such a drag (2014) · cites this paper as Macleod, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Macleod, R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Macleod, Ross
ORCID
Macleod, Ross
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
523-530
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.020
OpenAlex
W1993665437
Cited by
23
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
flight performance, Parus major, predator avoidance, classical mechanics, work-energy theorem, flight speed, body mass, small birds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review