One-year prognosis after syncope and the failure of the ROSE decision instrument to predict one-year adverse events
Abstract
Study objective We investigate the incidence of adverse events at 1 year in the cohort of emergency department (ED) syncope patients enrolled in the original Risk Stratification of Syncope in the Emergency Department (ROSE) study, the time to adverse event, and the test performance of the ROSE decision instrument to detect events at 1 year.Methods This report details the 1-year follow-up of adult syncope patients presenting to the ED who were enrolled into the ROSE study, a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. The primary endpoint was the combination of serious outcome and all-cause death at 1 year. Serious outcome encompassed acute myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmia, need for pacemaker/implantable defibrillator, pulmonary embolus, cerebrovascular accident, intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage, and interventional procedure or hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death and cardiovascular serious outcome at 1 year.Results One thousand forty-three patients were available for analysis; 162 patients (15.5%) had a primary outcome. Twenty-eight (17%) of these were within 24 hours, 56 (35%) were within 1 week, and 78 (48%) were within 1 month. The remaining 84 (52%) outcomes occurred between months 2 and 12. At 1 year, 71 (6.8%) patients had died and 76 (7.3%) had a cardiovascular serious outcome. The sensitivity and specificity of the ROSE decision instrument for 1-year serious outcome and all-cause death were, respectively, 71.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.9% to 78.3%) and 71.1% (95% CI 67.9% to 74.0%); for 1-year all-cause death, 76.1% (95% CI 64.2% to 85.1%) and 67.4% (95% CI 64.3% to 70.3%); and for 1-year cardiovascular serious outcome, 75.0% (95% CI 63.5% to 83.9%) and 67.5% (95% CI 64.5% to 70.5%).Conclusion The proportion of patients with serious outcome and all-cause death 1 year after syncope is similar to that reported in recent international syncope studies. We have defined the proportion of patients with cardiovascular serious outcome at 1 year and have shown that most events occurred in the first month, with decreased frequency of events observed after that time especially marked for cardiovascular serious outcome. More than 50% of the outcomes observed, however, occurred after the first month. The ROSE decision instrument does not perform well at predicting 1-year outcome of ED syncope patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the emergency department syncope clinical decision rules are used widely in emergency departments due to poor sensitivity and specificity reported from external validation, or due to a lack of external validation.
“None of these rules are used widely in EDs due to poor sensitivity and specificity reported from external validation, or due to a lack of external validation. 70,78-85”
From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [84]
Cites
(2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010746 · Cited by 6,470 · see citing works
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Bassand, J., Hamm, C. W., Ardissino, D., Boersma, E. H., Budaj, A., Fernández‐Avilés, F., Fox, K. A. A., Hasdai, D., Ohman, E. M., Wallentin, L. C., et al. (2007) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161 · Cited by 1,850 · see citing works
A Prospective Evaluation and Follow-up of Patients with Syncope
Kapoor, W. N., Karpf, M., Wieand, S., Peterson, J. R., & Levey, G. S. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198307283090401 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Colivicchi, F. (2003) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00827-8 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
The ROSE (Risk Stratification of Syncope in the Emergency Department) Study
Reed, M. J., Newby, D. E., Coull, A. J., Prescott, R. J., Jacques, K. G., & Gray, A. J. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationShort- and Long-Term Prognosis of Syncope, Risk Factors, and Role of Hospital Admission
Costantino, G., Perego, F., Dipaola, F., Borella, M., Galli, A., Cantoni, G., Dell’Orto, S., Dassi, S., Filardo, N., Duca, P. G., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.059 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Ungar, A., Rosso, A. D., Giada, F., Bartoletti, A., Furlan, R., Quartieri, F., Lagi, A., Morrione, A., Mussi, C., Lunati, M., et al. (2010) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq017 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Death After Emergency Department Visits for Syncope: How Common and Can It Be Predicted?
Quinn, J., McDERMOTT, D. J., Kramer, N., Yeh, C. C., Kohn, M. A., Stiell, I. G., & Wells, G. A. (2007) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.08.005 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Predictors of Short-Term (Seven-Day) Cardiac Outcomes After Emergency Department Visit for Syncope
Gabayan, G. Z., Derose, S. F., Asch, S. M., Chiu, V. Y., Glenn, S. C., Mangione, C. M., & Sun, B. (2009) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.654 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Risk Stratification of Syncope in the Emergency Department: The ROSE Study
Reed, M. J., Newby, D. E., Coull, A. J., Prescott, R. J., Jacques, K. G., & Gray, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.06.033 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope
Brignole, M., Moya, A., de Lange, F. J., Deharo, J.-C., Elliott, P. M., Fanciulli, A., Fedorowski, A., Furlan, R., Kenny, R. A., Martín, A., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Self-citationKey challenges in the current management of syncope
Sutton, R., Brignole, M., & Benditt, D. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2012.102 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Reed, M. J., Grubb, N. R., Lang, C. C., Gray, A. J., Simpson, K., MacRaild, A., & Weir, C. J. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2018-207570 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Reed, M. J., Henderson, S. S., Newby, D. E., & Gray, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reed, Matthew J.
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-256
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135334015
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- syncope, risk stratification, one-year prognosis, adverse events, all-cause mortality, diagnostic accuracy, risk prediction model, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmias, hemorrhagic stroke, pacemaker implantation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, pulmonary embolism, stroke
- MeSH terms
- Decision Support Techniques, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syncope, Time Factors, Confidence Intervals, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review