Cited by 779Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

A Prospective Evaluation and Follow-up of Patients with Syncope

Kapoor, Wishwa N., Karpf, Michael, Wieand, Sam, Peterson, Jacqueline R., Levey, Gerald S.·1983·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated and followed 204 patients with syncope to determine how often a cause of syncope could be established and to define the prognosis of such patients. A cardiovascular cause was established in 53 patients and a noncardiovascular cause in 54. The cause remained unknown in 97 patients. At 12 months, the overall mortality was 14 +/- 2.5 per cent. The mortality rate (30 +/- 6.7 per cent) in patients with a cardiovascular cause of syncope was significantly higher than the rate (12 +/- 4.4 per cent) in patients with a noncardiovascular cause (P = 0.02) and the rate (6.4 +/- 2.8 per cent) in patients with syncope of unknown origin (P less than 0.0001). The incidence of sudden death was 24 +/- 6.6 per cent in patients with a cardiovascular cause, as compared with 4 +/- 2.7 per cent in patients with a noncardiovascular cause (P = 0.005) and 3 +/- 1.8 per cent in patients with syncope of unknown origin (P = 0.0002). Patients with syncope can be separated into diagnostic categories that have prognostic importance. Patients with a cardiovascular cause have a strikingly higher incidence of sudden death than patients with a noncardiovascular or unknown cause.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198307283090401

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence suggests that routine neurological testing is of very limited value in the context of syncope evaluation and management; the diagnostic yield is low, with very high cost per diagnosis.

    “The evidence suggests that routine neurological testing is of very limited value in the context of syncope evaluation and management; the diagnostic yield is low, with very high cost per diagnosis (36,77,78,251–260).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapoor, W. N., Karpf, M., Wieand, S., Peterson, J. R., & Levey, G. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1983-07-28
Volume
309
Issue
4
Pages
197-204
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2338589661
Cited by
779
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
26.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
syncope, cardiovascular syncope, syncope of unknown origin, sudden death, mortality, prognosis, follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Death, Sudden, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review