Cited by 294Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Efficacy of chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors: pooled post hoc analyses of the OAK and POPLAR trials

Open access
Chalabi, M., Cardona, A., Nagarkar, D.R., Dhawahir Scala, A., Gandara, D.R., Rittmeyer, A., Albert, M.L., Powles, T. +2 more·2020·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) can modulate the microbiome, and single-arm studies suggested that antibiotics (ATB) may decrease the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but randomized controlled trial data are lacking. This pooled analysis evaluated the effect of ATB and PPI on outcome in patients randomized between ICI and chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used pooled data from the phase II POPLAR (NCT01903993) and phase III OAK (NCT02008227) trials, which included 1512 patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab (n = 757) or docetaxel (n = 755). The main objective of this analysis was to assess the impact of ATB and PPI use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 169 (22.3%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 202 (26.8%) in the docetaxel group received ATB, and 234 (30.9%) and 260 (34.4%), respectively, received PPI. Multivariate analysis in all patients revealed that ATB were associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.39], as was PPI (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44). Within the atezolizumab population, OS was significantly shorter in patients who received ATB (8.5 versus 14.1 months, HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.63, P = 0.01) or PPI (9.6 versus 14.5 months, HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20-1.75, P = 0.0001). PPI use was associated with shorter PFS in the atezolizumab population (1.9 versus 2.8 months, HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.53, P = 0.001). There was no association between ATB and PPI use and PFS or OS within the docetaxel population. CONCLUSION: In this unplanned analysis from two randomized trials, data suggest that ATB or PPI use in patients with metastatic NSCLC is associated with poor outcome and may influence the efficacy of ICI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.006

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbiota composition is associated with response to ICB in cancer patients, and antibiotic use near treatment start can alter therapy efficacy.

    “Recent studies have demonstrated associations between microbiota composition and response to ICB in cancer patients, and evidence suggests that use of antibiotics near the start of treatment can alter therapy efficacy (Chalabi et al., 2020; Chaput et al., 2017; Frankel et al., 2017; Gopalakrishnan et al., 2018; Khan et al., 2021; Matson et al., 2018; Pinato et al., 2019; Routy et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chalabi, M., Cardona, A., Nagarkar, D. R., Dhawahir Scala, A., Gandara, D. R., Rittmeyer, A., Albert, M. L., Powles, T., Kok, M., & Herrera, F. G.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • Genentech (US)
  • UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Barts Cancer Institute (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Chalabi, M.
  • Herrera, F.G.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
525-531
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000696551
Cited by
294
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 1
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  • F Hoffmann-La Roche
  • Genentech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, atezolizumab, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, docetaxel, microbiome, overall survival, progression-free survival, OAK trial, POPLAR trial, drug interactions, immunotherapy efficacy, previously treated patients, PD-L1 expression, PD-1 expression, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Proton Pump Inhibitors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review