Cited by 413Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: results from the phase 1b open-label, multicohort KEYNOTE-173 study

Open access
Schmid, P., Salgado, R., Park, Y.H., Muñoz-Couselo, E., Kim, S.B., Sohn, J., Im, S.-A., Foukakis, T. +8 more·2020·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background The phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 study was conducted to assess the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in high-risk, early-stage, non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Patients and methods Six pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy regimens were evaluated (cohorts A-F). All cohorts received a pembrolizumab 200-mg run-in dose (cycle 1), then eight cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with a taxane with or without carboplatin for 12 weeks, and then doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for an additional 12 weeks before surgery. Primary end points were safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, objective response rate, and event-free and overall survival. Exploratory end points were the relationship between outcome and potential biomarkers, such as tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (combined positive score) and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (sTILs).Results Sixty patients were enrolled between 18 February 2016, and 28 February 2017. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 22 patients, most commonly febrile neutropenia (n = 10 across cohorts). Four cohorts (B, C, D, F) did not meet the RP2D threshold; two cohorts did (A, E). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (73%). Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 18 patients (30%) and were grade ≥3 in six patients (10%). The pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0) across all cohorts was 60% (range 49%-71%). Twelve-month event-free and overall survival rates ranged from 80% to 100% across cohorts (100% for four cohorts). Higher pre-treatment PD-L1 combined positive score, and pre- and on-treatment sTILs were significantly associated with higher pCR rates (P = 0.0127, 0.0059, and 0.0085, respectively).Conclusion Combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for high-risk, early-stage TNBC showed manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity. In an exploratory analysis, the pCR rate showed a positive correlation with tumor PD-L1 expression and sTIL levels.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02622074.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.072

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164e172.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmid, P., Salgado, R., Park, Y. H., Muñoz-Couselo, E., Kim, S. B., Sohn, J., Im, S.-A., Foukakis, T., Kuemmel, S., Dent, R., Yin, L., Wang, A., Tryfonidis, K., Karantza, V., Cortés, J., & Loi, S.
Affiliations
  • Barts Cancer Institute (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES)
Corresponding author
Schmid, P.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
569-581
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008792561
Cited by
413
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 1
FWCI
23.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
  • Merck & Co., Inc.
  • Merck Sharp and Dohme
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
triple-negative breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-L1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, pathological complete response, taxanes, carboplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, dose-limiting toxicity, immune-related adverse events, early breast cancer, biomarkers, event-free survival
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Carboplatin, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review