Cited by 46Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationHealth and Well-being Studies

Erratum to Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale [Asian Nursing Research 6 (2012) 121–127]

Open access
Lee, Eun-Hyun·2013·Asian Nursing Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anr.2013.08.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, E.-H.
Corresponding author
Lee, Eun-Hyun
Venue
Asian Nursing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
160
ISSN
1976-1317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044164643
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asian Nursing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
Perceived Stress Scale, psychometric properties, stress measurement, scale validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review