Cited by 71Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

An Internet-based program for depressive symptoms using human and automated support: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Mira, Adriana, Bretón-López, Juana, García-Palacios, Azucena, Quero, Soledad, Baños, Rosa Maria, Botella, Cristina·2017·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of an Internet-based program for depressive symptoms using automated support by information and communication technologies (ICTs) and human support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An Internet-based program was used to teach adaptive ways to cope with depressive symptoms and daily problems. A total of 124 participants who were experiencing at least one stressful event that caused interference in their lives, many of whom had clinically significant depressive symptoms, were randomly assigned into either an intervention group with ICT support (automated mobile phone messages, automated emails, and continued feedback through the program); an intervention group with ICT support plus human support (brief weekly support phone call without clinical content); or a waiting-list control. At pre-, post-, and 12-month follow-up, they completed depression, anxiety, positive and negative effect, and perceived stress measures. Results were analyzed using both intention-to-treat and completers data. The majority were women (67.7%), with a mean age of 35.6 years (standard deviation =9.7). RESULTS: The analysis showed that the two intervention groups improved significantly pre- to posttreatment, compared with the control group. Furthermore, improvements were maintained at the 12-month follow-up. Adherence and satisfaction with the program was high in both conditions. CONCLUSION: The Internet-based program was effective and well accepted, with and without human support, showing that ICT-based automated support may be useful. It is essential to continue to study other ICT strategies for providing support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s130994

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]European Pact for Mental Health and Wellbeing EU high level conference. Together for metal health and wellbeing Brussels 2008
  2. [48]González-Robles A Mira A Riera López del Amo A Psychometric properties of the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale in Spanish sample. General and clinical populations Poster presented at: European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) Conference September 17–18 Poland

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mira, A., Bretón-López, J., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Mira, Adriana
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2017-03
Volume
Volume 13
Pages
987-1006
ISSN
  • 1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2021
OpenAlex
W2602064865
Cited by
71
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depressive symptoms, online intervention, automated support, human support, mobile phone messages, email feedback, coping, life events, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, program adherence, user satisfaction, maintenance of treatment effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review