Cited by 555Free Radicals and AntioxidantsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Antioxidant and structure–activity relationships (SARs) of some phenolic and anilines compounds

Open access
Bendary, E., Francis, R.R., Ali, H.M.G., Sarwat, M.I., El Hady, S.·2013·Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Abstract

The scavenging behavior of a series of phenolic and anilines compounds toward H2O2 and DPPH was examined. The efficient concentration (EC50) was calculated for all compounds under investigation by using H2O2-scavenging activity assay. The antiradical efficiency (AE) and EC50 were calculated for all investigated compounds by applying DPPH scavenging activity assay. Wide differences among compounds in each series and between the two series were observed. In H2O2-scavenging activity assay, the anilines series were more active than the phenolic series due to the reduction properties of the anilines compounds. While in the DPPH scavenging activity, the phenolic compounds were more active than the anilines compounds due to the lower bond dissociation energies (BDE) of O–H than that of N–H. So, the phenolic compounds were comparatively easier to lose H atom than anilines. The antioxidant activity related to the compound structure was found to be dependable on the number of the included active group (OH or NH2). The more active compound is the more included active groups. The position of the active groups also plays an important role of structure–antioxidant relationship activity. The ortho position was found to be the more active one, due to its ability to form intramolecular hydrogen bonding (iHB), followed by para position and then meta position of compounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bendary, E., Francis, R. R., Ali, H. M. G., Sarwat, M. I., & El Hady, S.
Affiliations
Ain Shams University (EG)
Corresponding author
Bendary, E.
Venue
Annals of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
173-181
ISSN
0570-1783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964801668
Cited by
555
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Agricultural Science Cairo (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
antioxidant activity, structure-activity relationship, phenolic compounds, aniline, hydrogen peroxide scavenging, DPPH radical scavenging, bond dissociation energy, intramolecular hydrogen bonding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review