Cited by 287Accounting Theory and Financial ReportingAccounting and Organizational ManagementHistorical Economic and Legal Thought

Accounting for god: accounting and accountability practices in the society of Jesus (Italy, XVI–XVII centuries)

Quattrone, Paolo·2004·Accounting Organizations and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aos.2004.03.001

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 109 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quattrone, P.
Venue
Accounting Organizations and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
647-683
ISSN
0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970760462
Cited by
287
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
25.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accounting Organizations and Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Economic and Legal Thought
Keywords
Jesuits, history of accounting, accountability practices, Counter-Reformation, absolutism, religious hierarchy, economic resource allocation, 16th-17th centuries, religious orders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review