Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prompt templates, segmentation rules, and annotation schemas are reported as part of the study's procedural record, enabling reviewers and institutional gatekeepers to trace how analytic claims move from text to output and where interpretive discretion is exercised.
“Prompt templates, segmentation rules, and annotation schemas are reported as part of the study's procedural record, enabling reviewers and institutional gatekeepers to trace how analytic claims move from text to output and where interpretive discretion is exercised [20,37].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Latour's concept of inscription devices demonstrates that methods actively shape what becomes legible as knowledge rather than serving solely as mechanisms for recording phenomena.
“Latour's [20] concept of inscription devices demonstrates that methods actively shape what becomes legible as knowledge rather than serving solely as mechanisms for recording phenomena.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quattrone, P. (2004) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.03.001 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Socio-Technical Agency in Financial Markets: The Case of the Stock Ticker
Preda, A. (2006) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312706059543 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
A Sociocultural Perspective on Opportunity to Learn
Gee, J. P. (2008) · Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802157.006 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Deceitful Media: Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test
Natale, S. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190080365.001.0001 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Grossman, P. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.008 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Bradley, F. (2022) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2022.2101911 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Islands of Practice: Conflict and a Lack of ‘Community’ in Situated Learning
Macpherson, A., & Clark, B. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609340810 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Llewellyn, S., Procter, R., Harvey, G., Maniatopoulos, G., & Boyd, A. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02230 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Scaling of HIS in a global context: Same, same, but different
Sahay, S., Sæbø, J., & Braa, J. (2013) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.08.002 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns
Berliner, D., Legrain, L., & van de Port, M. (2013) · Social Anthropology · doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12051 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Changing food behaviors in a desirable direction
Schifferstein, H. N. (2020) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2019.11.002 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Reflections on the data protection compliance of AI systems under the EU AI Act
Hohmann, B., & Kollár, G. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2560654 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
<i>Blattes de Byzance</i>in India: Mollusk Opercula and the History of Perfumery
McHUGH, J. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland · doi:10.1017/s1356186312000727 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ahmad, H., & Ghafar, N. A. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01254-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 37-1511-37-1511
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4301008122
- Cited by
- 1,428
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 87 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 34
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- science studies, philosophy of science, sociology of science, science and technology studies, epistemology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
