Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The platform seeks to provide a complex set of possibilities for making connections, not a clear and parsimonious ranking or rating.
“Possibly as a feature intended to continue to offer competition and lower the barriers for entry, the picture which the platform seeks to provide is not the clear and parsimonious one of ranking and ratings (Pollock & D'Adderio, 2012: 258), but rather a complex set of possibilities for making connections which may not immediately be clear.”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Pollock & D'Adderio, 2012
The indexed passage labeled “1 Finished” discusses how a graphical ranking device shapes IT markets, but does not describe the citing document’s platform or its possibilities for making connections. Searches for the claimed contrast with clear rankings and ratings, and for platform connections and barriers to entry, found no passage addressing it. The indexed passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935 · see citing works
An introduction to market devices
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2007.00727.x · Cited by 795 · see citing works
Lynch, M. (1988) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00177304 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Tracking the numbers: Across accounting and finance, organizations and markets
Vollmer, H., Mennicken, A., & Preda, A. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.06.007 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Cuckston, T. (2018) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-10-2015-2264 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
The state of affairs: Critical performativity and the online dating industry
Roscoe, P., & Chillas, S. (2014) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508413485497 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pollock, N., & D’Adderio, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pollock, Neil
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 565-586
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127651500
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 14.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Accounting Organizations and Society (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G010250/1, ES/E01948X/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- ranking, sociomateriality, information technology market, market construction, affordances, materiality, market participants, performance indicators, science and technology studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
