Cited by 279Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsHydrogen Storage and Materials

Co–Ni–B nanocatalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction in wide pH range

Open access
Gupta, S., Patel, N., Fernandes, R., Kadrekar, R., Dashora, Alpa, Yadav, A.K., Bhattacharyya, D., Jha, S.N. +2 more·2016·Applied Catalysis B: Environmental

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.032

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The (111) peak is located between the standard fcc Co and Ni patterns, which indicates the formation of alloy.

    “Specifically, the (111) peak located between the standard fcc Co (PDF. No. 89-7093, 44.226o) and Ni (PDF. No. 70-0989, 44.604o) patterns, which indicates the formation of alloy [40, 41].”

    From Synthesis of Co2Ni/reduced graphene oxide composite aerogels as efficient hydrogen evolution catalysts (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results and discussion section (page unavailable) reports a Co–Ni coordination shell in the Co–Ni–B catalyst, supporting an association between the metals. It does not report a (111) diffraction peak between the standard fcc Co and Ni positions or use that peak to establish alloy formation; its XRD discussion instead describes the sample as amorphous. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The activity of Co2Ni/5rGO is comparable to well-studied metal sulfide and phosphide catalysts and superior to the Co-30Ni-B catalyst.

    “studied metal sulfide and phosphide catalyst and is superior”

    From Synthesis of Co2Ni/reduced graphene oxide composite aerogels as efficient hydrogen evolution catalysts (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results and discussion report HER performance for Co-30Ni-B, and Table S6 gives its overpotential at several current densities. The paper therefore supports using Co-30Ni-B as a benchmark, but our copy does not assess Co2Ni/5rGO or establish that it is superior to Co-30Ni-B or comparable to metal sulfide and phosphide catalysts. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The TOF number increases ~12% compared to the Co-30Ni-B electrocatalyst prepared by the similar NaBH4 reduction method (0.145 s−1 atom−1 at η=250 mV).

    “TOF number increases ~12% compared to that of Co-”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. P. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Yang, T. Yao, H. Han, L. Sun, Nano Energy (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.020. · DOI
  2. Y. Okamoto, Y. Nitta, T. Imanaka, S. Teranishi, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 75 (1979) 2027- 2039.
  3. S. Basu, C. Nayak, A. K. Yadav, A. Agrawal, A. K. Poswal, D. Bhattacharyya, S. N. Jha, N. K. Sahoo, India. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 493 (2014) 012032.
  4. P. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Yang, T. Yao, H. Han, L. Sun, Nano Energy (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.020. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, S., Patel, N., Fernandes, R., Kadrekar, R., Dashora, A., Yadav, A. K., Bhattacharyya, D., Jha, S. N., Miotello, A., & Kothari, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Mumbai (IN)
  • Center for Excellence in Basic Sciences (IN)
  • Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
  • University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Patel, N.
Venue
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
192
Pages
126-133
ISSN
0926-3373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2298579473
Cited by
279
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Catalysis B: Environmental (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • UGC-UPE Green Technology Project
  • UGC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, amorphous alloys, nickel content, wide pH range, Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism, Tafel slope, catalyst stability, low-cost electrocatalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review