The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WRF wind simulation and wind energy production estimates forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data for Portugal
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., et al. (1996) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:tnyrp>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 28,360
The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., et al. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.828 · Cited by 24,480
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., et al. (2007) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2005rg000183 · Cited by 8,927
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D. M., Wang, W., Huang, X., & Duda, M. (2008) · UCAR/NCAR · doi:10.5065/d68s4mvh · Cited by 8,925
Uppala, S. M., KÅllberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V. D. C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., et al. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.04.176 · Cited by 6,804
NCEP–DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2)
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., & Potter, G. L. (2002) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-83-11-1631 · Cited by 5,771
The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., et al. (2010) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/2010bams3001.1 · Cited by 5,136
MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G.-K., et al. (2011) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00015.1 · Cited by 4,852
ONOGI, K., TSUTSUI, J., KOIDE, H., SAKAMOTO, M., KOBAYASHI, S., HATSUSHIKA, H., MATSUMOTO, T., YAMAZAKI, N., KAMAHORI, H., TAKAHASHI, K., et al. (2007) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II · doi:10.2151/jmsj.85.369 · Cited by 1,559
Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation
Foley, A. M., Leahy, P. G., Marvuglia, A., & McKeogh, E. J. (2012) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.033 · Cited by 1,317
Cited by
Frequency and duration of low-wind-power events in Germany
Ohlendorf, N., & Schill, W.-P. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab91e9 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gómez-Gesteira, M., & Silva Santos, C.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 116-126
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039544397
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WRF wind simulation and wind energy production estimates forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data for Portugal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.001
- The paper
- Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gómez-Gesteira, M., & Silva Santos, C. (2014). WRF wind simulation and wind energy production estimates forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data for Portugal. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
