The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication
Kantowitz, B., & Suchman, L. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423221 · Cited by 5,299
(2013) · Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_100431 · Cited by 4,799
The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258093 · Cited by 4,306
Gluesing, J. C. (2012) · Leadership in Science and Technology: A Reference Handbook · doi:10.4135/9781412994231.n14 · Cited by 3,210
Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 · Cited by 2,374
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Cited by
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 · Cited by 633
From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA): A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW
Lee, C. P., & Paine, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675161 · Cited by 139
Exploring the use of regular reflections in student collaboration: a case study in higher education
Schürmann, V., Bodemer, D., & Marquardt, N. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1526487 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Patel, H., Pettitt, M., & Wilson, J. R.
- Venue
- Applied Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973010379
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009
- The paper
- Patel, H., Pettitt, M., & Wilson, J. R. (2012). Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model. Applied Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
