Cited by 29Occupational Health and PerformanceLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesSports Performance and Training

Terrain coefficients for predicting energy costs of walking over snow

Open access
Richmond, Paul W., Potter, Adam W., Looney, David P., Santee, William R.·2019·Applied Ergonomics

Abstract

Background Predicting the energy costs of human travel over snow can be of significant value to the military and other agencies planning work efforts when snow is present. The ability to quantify, and predict, those costs can help planners determine if snow will be a factor in the execution of dismounted tasks and operations. To adjust predictive models for the effect of terrain, and more specifically for surface conditions, on energy costs, terrain coefficients (ƞ) have been developed. The physiological demands of foot travel over snow have been studied previously, and there are well established methods of predicting metabolic costs of locomotion. By applying knowledge gained from prior studies of the effects of terrain and snow, and by leveraging those existing dismounted locomotion models, this paper seeks to outline the steps in developing an improved terrain coefficient (ƞ) for snow to be used in predictive modeling. Methods Using published data, methods, and a well-informed understanding of the physical elements of terrain, e.g., characterization of snow sinkage (z), this study made adjustments to ƞ-values specific to snow. Results This review of published metabolic cost methods suggest that an improved ƞ-value could be developed for use with the Pandolf equation, where z = depth (h)*(1 - (snow density (ρ0)/1.186)) and ƞ = 0.0005z3 + 0.0001z2 + 0.1072z + 1.2604. Conclusion While the complexity of variables related to characteristics of snow, speed of movement, and individuals confound efforts to develop a simple, predictive model, this paper provides data-driven improvements to models that are used to predict the energy costs of dismounted movements over snow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.017

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Day, 2012, Chapter 6. Nutrition and military performance, 157
  2. Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1994, Planning and design of roads, airfields, and heliports in the theater of operations - road design, Field Man.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richmond, P. W., Potter, A. W., Looney, D. P., & Santee, W. R.
Affiliations
  • Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Potter, Adam W.
Venue
Applied Ergonomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
74
Pages
48-54
ISSN
0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885503817
Cited by
29
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineer Research and Development Center
  • Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
energy cost of walking, metabolic cost of locomotion, military operations planning
MeSH terms
Biobehavioral Sciences, Energy Metabolism, Forecasting, Humans, Locomotion, Snow, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review