Cited by 38Urban Transport and AccessibilityTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

Comparing distance, time, and metabolic energy cost functions for walking accessibility in infrastructure-poor regions

Páez, Antonio, Anjum, Zoha, Dickson-Anderson, Sarah E., Schuster-Wallace, Corinne J., Martín Ramos, Belén, Higgins, Christopher D.·2020·Journal of Transport Geography

Abstract

Accessibility is a widely used concept in transportation planning and research. However a majority of the literature is concerned with accessibility in infrastructure-rich regions where it is used to assess the output of infrastructure. Relatively scant attention in contrast has been paid to the topic of accessibility in infrastructure-poor regions. These are regions characterized by non-homogeneous landscapes with limited or no transportation infrastructure. Even studies that deal with infrastructure-poor regions tend to transpose the methods used elsewhere. This practice seems inappropriate when mobility happens by active rather than motorized modes since the effort required for movement is likely different. The objective of this paper is to compare distance, time, and metabolic energy cost functions in walking accessibility. To this end, we present a case study of accessibility to water in central Kenya. The results indicate that Euclidean distance, surface distance, and travel time correlate better between them than any of them does with metabolic energy. Furthermore, while shortest paths tend to be symmetric for distance and time criteria, under consideration of metabolic energy expenditure pathways change significantly depending on the direction of movement. This has implications for measuring accessibility and equity. By providing alternate mechanisms for valuing the cost of movement, this research suggests avenues to consider vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women who require greater nutritional intake and expend more energy per unit activity. Directions for further research include certain trade-offs between route choice variables across various applications, for example, walking and cycling route choice algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102564

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ebener, 2005, Physical accessibility to health care: from isotropy to anisotropy, J. Article, 9
  2. Marcaria, 1938, Sulla fisiologia e specialmente sul consumo energetico della marcia e della corsa a varie velocita ed inclinazioni de1 terreno, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Mem. Classe Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. Sez, 3, 299

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Páez, A., Anjum, Z., Dickson-Anderson, S. E., Schuster-Wallace, C. J., Martín Ramos, B., & Higgins, C. D.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Páez, Antonio
Venue
Journal of Transport Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
82
Pages
102564
ISSN
0966-6923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993807788
Cited by
38
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Transport Geography (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
pedestrian accessibility, metabolic cost, travel time, surface distance, Euclidean distance, accessibility measurement, accessibility equity, water access, shortest path, route choice, vulnerable populations, pregnant women, active travel, Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review