Cited by 293Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMedical Practices and RehabilitationAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Stroke Rehabilitation Patients, Practice, and Outcomes: Is Earlier and More Aggressive Therapy Better?

Horn, Susan D., DeJong, Gerben, Smout, Randall J., Gassaway, Julie, James, Roberta, Conroy, Brendan·2005·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Unlabelled Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Objective To examine associations of patient characteristics, rehabilitation therapies, neurotropic medications, nutritional support, and timing of initiation of rehabilitation with functional outcomes and discharge destination for inpatient stroke rehabilitation patients. Design Prospective observational cohort study. Setting Five U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Participants Post-stroke rehabilitation patients (N=830; age, >18 y) with moderate or severe strokes, from the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project database. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Discharge total, motor, and cognitive FIM scores and discharge destination. Results Controlling for patient differences, various activities and interventions were associated with better outcomes including earlier initiation of rehabilitation, more time spent per day in higher-level rehabilitation activities such as gait, upper-extremity control, and problem solving, use of newer psychiatric medications, and enteral feeding. Several findings part with conventional practice, such as starting gait training in the first 3 hours of physical therapy, even for low-level patients, was associated with better outcomes. Conclusions Specific therapy activities and interventions are associated with better outcomes. Earlier rehabilitatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn, S. D., DeJong, G., Smout, R. J., Gassaway, J., James, R., & Conroy, B.
Affiliations
  • International Severity Information Systems (United States) (US)
  • MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
86
Issue
12
Pages
101-114
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045381526
Cited by
293
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (H133B 990005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, inpatient rehabilitation, functional outcome, discharge disposition, motor function, cognitive function, gait training, enteral nutrition, tube feeding, psychiatric medication, patient characteristics
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Central Nervous System Agents, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Rehabilitation Centers, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review