Cited by 127Cancer survivorship and carePhysical Activity and HealthChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Effect of home- and community-based physical activity interventions on physical function among cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Swartz, Maria C., Lewis, Zakkoyya H., Lyons, Elizabeth J., Jennings, Kristofer, Middleton, Addie, Deer, Rachel R., Arnold, Demi, Dresser, Kaitlin +2 more·2017·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of home- and community-based physical activity interventions on physical functioning among cancer survivors based on the most prevalent physical function measures, randomized trials were reviewed.Data sources Five electronic databases-Medline Ovid, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO-were searched from inception to March 2016 for relevant articles.Study selection Search terms included community-based interventions, physical functioning, and cancer survivors. A reference librarian trained in systematic reviews conducted the final search.Data extraction Four reviewers evaluated eligibility and 2 reviewers evaluated methodological quality. Data were abstracted from studies that used the most prevalent physical function measurement tools-Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, and 6-minute walk test. Random- or fixed-effects models were conducted to obtain overall effect size per physical function measure.Data synthesis Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria and were used to compute standardized mean differences using the inverse variance statistical method. The median sample size was 83 participants. Most of the studies (n=7) were conducted among breast cancer survivors. The interventions produced short-term positive effects on physical functioning, with overall effect sizes ranging from small (.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], .07-.27) to medium (.45; 95% CI, .23-.67). Community-based interventions that met in groups and used behavioral change strategies produced the largest effect sizes.Conclusions Home and community-based physical activity interventions may be a potential tool to combat functional deterioration among aging cancer survivors. More studies are needed among other cancer types using clinically relevant objective functional measures (eg, gait speed) to accelerate translation into the community and clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.017

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A supervised progressive resistance training program focused on large muscle groups, performed 2-3 times per week with a "start low, progress slow" principle, is safe for upper extremity breast cancer-related lymphedema.

    “For resistance training, a general progressive program focused on large muscle groups performed 2–3 times per week, with the principle of “start low, progress slow” is safe when supervised by a fitness professional(38–42).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [48]Flores AM Hodges LC Brewer LH Recovering Shoulder Function and Quality of Life after Breast Cancer Surgery Journal of the Section on Women’s Health 2004 28 7 14
  2. [96]Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised ed) New York Academic Press 1977

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swartz, M. C., Lewis, Z. H., Lyons, E. J., Jennings, K., Middleton, A., Deer, R. R., Arnold, D., Dresser, K., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Goodwin, J. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Swartz, Maria C.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
98
Issue
8
Pages
1652-1665
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2552194327
Cited by
127
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG024832)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD055929)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer survivors, physical activity interventions, home-based exercise, community-based exercise, physical function, functional decline, breast cancer survivors, group intervention, behavioral change strategies, quality of life, 6-minute walk test, SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Community Health Services, Disability Evaluation, Health Promotion, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Residence Characteristics, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Survivors, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review